1
$\begingroup$

I've always taken for granted that if $(X, \tau)$ and $(Y, \tau^{'})$ are topological spaces with Borel sigma algebras $\sigma$ and $\sigma^{'}$, repectively, then if $f:X\rightarrow Y$ is continuous, it is Borel measurable. The proof seems straightforward:

Let $Z=\{A \in Y \mid f^{-1}(A) \in \sigma \}. $

Then, by continuity it holds that $\tau^{'} \subseteq Z$, and once can check that $Z$ is a sigma-algebra. Because $Z$ is itself a sigma-algebra, it holds that $\sigma^{'} \subseteq Z$. Therefore, for any Borel measurable set $B \in \sigma^{'}$, $f^{-1}(B) \in \sigma$, so that $f$ is Borel measurable.

However, there seems to be some posts concerned with whether the topology is Hausdorff or not (see https://mathoverflow.net/questions/181752/is-every-continuous-function-measurable and Is every continuous function measurable? )

For the life of me, given the proof above, I cannot see why this would be a concern. Can anybody give me any points of reference here? Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If you define a Borel sigma algebra as a sigma algebra which is generated by the open sets then every continuous function is measurable. In these posts you can read that they are defining Borel sigma algebra in a different way in non Hausdorff spaces. $\endgroup$ – Mark May 10 '19 at 18:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Borel means generated by open sets. Continuous means preimage of open set is open. $\endgroup$ – why May 10 '19 at 18:23
2
$\begingroup$

Define $\mathcal{S} = \{A \subseteq Y: f^{-1}[A]\in \textrm{Bor}(X)\}$ (note the notational improvements) and note that $\mathcal{S}$ is a $\sigma$-algebra on $Y$ as $f^{-1}[\cdot]$ preserves set operations and $\textrm{Bor}(X)$ is a $\sigma$-algebra.

Indeed $\tau' \subseteq \mathcal{S}$ by continuity of $f$ and so by minimality of the Borel $\sigma$-algebra, we have $\textrm{Bor}(Y) \subseteq \mathcal{S}$ which just says that $f^{-1}[B]$ is Borel in $X$ for any Borel subset $B$ of $Y$, ergo $f$ is $(\textrm{Bor}(X),\textrm{Bor}(Y)$)-measurable.

So far, so good, and this proof is valid if we define the Borel sets of $X$ as the smallest $\sigma$-algebra containing the open sets. The linked answers you provided however define Borel sets in a different way, namely the smallest $\sigma$-algebra containing both all open sets and all compact sets that are intersections of open sets (which are all compact sets in a $T_1$ space).

Of course this invalidates the proof as given. I'm no expert on this, but the other questions imply that this is relevant in topologies induced on a poset (Scott topologies etc.). In most cases you will not encounter this; in analysis (where most of measure theory is done) all spaces will be Hausdorff and the modified definition becomes irrelevant.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.