I recently repeated some math basics of the Fourier transform and of course stumbled across Euler's formula. When reading the term $\cos(x) + i\sin(x)$ I wondered why it could not be written as $2\cos(x)$. Since all professors always emphasize that a cosine is nothing but a $90$ degree shifted sine, I was wondering why the multiplication with i, which also causes a $90°$ shift on the complex plane, doesn't result in a $\cos$-function.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ note that for any chosen $x\in\Bbb R$ we have that $i\sin(x)$ is a purely imaginary number, however $2\cos (x)$ is real, so they cannot be equal $\endgroup$ – Masacroso May 1 at 10:49

"Cosine is 90 degree shifted sine" means a shift in the arguments, not the rotation of the values on the complex plane. That is $ \cos(x) = \sin(x+90^\circ) $. Multiplication by $i$ is rotating the value of the function, not shifting the argument.

  • $\begingroup$ I encountered another problem: If it is like you say, why is it that differentiation in the time domain (which would make a sine a cosine) is multiplication with i in the frequency domain? This is why the impedances of capacitors and inductors have the i in their formula, isnt it? But if cos(x) is not i*sin(x), how does this make sense? $\endgroup$ – Philipp317 Jul 23 at 6:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Philipp317 I would need more contest to be sure, but I think you're talking about a case of alternating current, where for example we assume that the charge on the capacitor is $Q(t) = {\rm Re}(Q_0 e^{i\omega t})$. Then you have $$ I = \frac{dQ}{dt} = {\rm Re}(i\omega Q_0 e^{i\omega t}) = {\rm Re}(I_0 e^{i\omega t})$$ where $I_0 = i\omega Q_0$. $\endgroup$ – Adam Latosiński Jul 23 at 9:06
  • $\begingroup$ I was talking about the current-voltage relation for a capacitor. It's described by I = C * dU/dt , basically meaning that if the applied voltage is a sine-wave, the resulting current is a cosine-wave. It effectively means a 90° degree shift for a harmonic input. The expression to describe the impedance of a capacitor in the frequency domain is 1/jwC , and here I thought the division by j in the denominator expresses the same phase shift the differential equation in the time domain described. But the answers told me, those 2 "phase shifts" are not the same $\endgroup$ – Philipp317 Jul 24 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ Division by $i$ is a phase shift in the oposite direction because while $i=e^{i\pi/2}$, we have $\frac{1}{i} = -i = e^{-i\pi/2 }$. $\endgroup$ – Adam Latosiński Jul 24 at 17:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, you must compare real part to the real part and imaginary part to the imaginary part. That gives you $$ -sin(\omega t) = \cos(\omega t + \pi/2)$$ $$ \cos(\omega t) = \sin(\omega t+\pi/2)$$ $\endgroup$ – Adam Latosiński Jul 28 at 7:33

It causes a shift when we deal with angles and not with functions of angles.

For example, in a frequency domain, we may write, $5i$ as $5\angle90^o$, which is a notation for $5e^{(i\omega t +\pi/2)}$

But here, we have $i. sin(x)$ and not a magnitude of a time or frequency domain voltage or current or whatsoever.

So, $i\cdot\sin(x)$ is not equal to $cos(x)$ . Also only $\sin(90°\pm x) = \cos(x)$, not when we have $i\cdot \sin(x)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.