I'm studying $p$-adic analysis now and particularly $p$-adic interpolation; for example, constructions like $p$-adic $L$-functions (Kubota-Leopoldt style). I'm having some difficulty though, and I'd like to start with knowing what motivates the study. What do you really do with $p$-adic zeta functions and $L$-functions?

  • $\begingroup$ Look in the chapter on p-adic L-functions in Washington's book on cyclotomic fields, e.g., section 5.6 on applications of the p-adic class number formula. $\endgroup$ – KCd May 9 '13 at 3:24
  • $\begingroup$ This may be silly, but you might similarly ponder why we bother using things defined on the real and complex numbers too! $\endgroup$ – Hurkyl May 10 '13 at 20:04

This is not a question that has a short answer, because $p$-adic $L$-functions are one of the pivotal objects in modern number theory.

Let me try, though:

Riemann proved that the zeta function assumes rational values at negative odd integers. The same sort of results holds for special values of Dirichlet $L$-functions.

Let us consider Dirichlet $L$-functions $\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \chi(n) n^{-k}$ where $\chi$ is a Dirichlet character modulo some $p^N$. (If $\chi$ is trivial, then this gives the "$p$-deprived" zeta function, i.e. the Riemann zeta function, but with Euler factor at $p$ removed.)

Now we can think of $n \mapsto \chi(n) n^{-k}$ as a character on $(\mathbb Z/p^N)^{\times}$ with values in $\mathbb Z[\zeta]/p^N$ (where $\zeta$ is an appropriate root of unity chosen so that the values of $\chi$ land in $\mathbb Z[\zeta]$).

If $\chi,k$ and $\chi',k'$ are such that the two characters $n \mapsto \chi(n)n^{-k}$ and $n \mapsto \chi'(n) n^{\prime -k}$ are congruent mod $p^a$ (for some $a \leq N$), then looking at the Dirichlet series you might imagine that the corresponding $L$-values $L(\chi,k)$ and $L(\chi',k')$ should also be congruenct mod $p^a$ (just because the individual terms are congruent).

Of course reasoning this way with congruences isn't valid for infinite series, and if $k$ and $k'$ are in the half-plane of convergence of the $L$-functions, then the corresponding $L$-values are transcendental and congruence doesn't even make sense.

But ... at values of $k$ and $k'$ where the values are rational numbers, the congruence does hold! Of course the above "reasoning" from a term-by-term congruence of the members of the sequence is bogus, both because it is not valid for an infinite series, and the series doesn't converge at these negative values of $k$ anyway. But one can still prove the congruence. (Kummer did the case $a = 1$, i.e. just working mod $p$. Kubota and Leopoldt did the general case.)

Kummer's motivation was (among other things) that the case when $k = 0$ and $\chi$ is non-trivial has to do with the class numbers of $p$-adic cyclotomic fields (by the class number formula) and he wanted to know when these were divisible by $p$ (i.e. when primes were irregular). Using his congruence, he could instead test this by working with the trivial character but with a non-zero (negative) value of $k$. But in this case we are just looking at special values of the $\zeta$-function, which are Bernoulli numbers. This is how Kummer proved his criterion for a prime to be regular in terms of Bernoulli numbers.

So the theory of $p$-adic $L$-functions has its roots in Kummer's study of cyclotomic fields. It continues to be a central topic in the study of cyclotomic fields, and, generally speaking, $p$-adic $L$-functions form the basis for almost all modern investigations into formulas relating $L$-values and arithmetic (such as the BSD conjecture, the main conjecture of Iwasawa theory in various contexts, the Bloch--Kato conj., etc.)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.