1
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

I understand the process of solving this problem but there is one thing that I am confused about.

Why, in order to win, do we need $N(\tau)-N(s)=1$? I thought that the number of events in $(s, \tau]$ is given by $N(\tau)-N(s)$ so it would make sense that we want this to to be $0$, in order to win.

How can I get the probability of winning in this stopping game until nth event happens? Link to question asked before but this specific problem I am having was not addressed.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Well, if an event happens at exactly time $\tau$, then you want $N(\tau)-N(s)=1.$ $\endgroup$ – mjw Apr 30 at 20:22
  • $\begingroup$ @mjw The way I read it we do not want any events in $(s, \tau]$ ? $\endgroup$ – Jac Frall Apr 30 at 20:24
  • $\begingroup$ $(s,\tau)$ or $(s,\tau]$? $\endgroup$ – mjw Apr 30 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ @mjw Please see the update, it is directly from the textbook. $\endgroup$ – Jac Frall Apr 30 at 20:32
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, got it, thank you! I guess that in the light of the update, these comments are unnecessary. Glad you got a clearer picture and an answer that makes sense. $\endgroup$ – mjw May 1 at 19:31
1
$\begingroup$

If there are zero events in the interval $(s,\tau)$, then you lose because you never stop.

If there are two or more events in $(s,\tau)$, then you lose because you stop on the first one, and then a second one occurs before $\tau$, so you did not stop on the last event before $\tau$.

Only when there is exactly one event in $(s,t)$ do you win, because then that event you stop on is the last event to occur.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Whoops, there is my problem, I assumed $s$ was the time that you stop, when actually you stop on the first event after $s$ $\endgroup$ – Jac Frall Apr 30 at 20:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.