0
$\begingroup$

I'm new to equivalence classes here, so I hope someone could help me out

Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EquivalenceClass.html) defined equivalence classes as "a subset of the form$ (x \in X:x\sim a),$ where a is an element of X and the notation $"x\sim y"$ is used to mean that there is an equivalence relation between $x$ and $y$.

I wonder if that is the case, then is the equivalence classes of the relation $x\sim y$ if $x=y$ in the real is just the set of $x$ itself? Then would the quotient space $R / \sim$ be an empty set?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you asking whether the case where $\sim$ is equality results in each equivalence class being a set with $1$ element? $\endgroup$ – J.G. Apr 23 at 16:20
  • $\begingroup$ Usually, we say "If ~ is an equivalence relation on a set $X$ and $a\in X,$ then the equivalence class of $a$ is the set of all $x\in X$ such that $x\sim a.$" So the equivalence class of $a$ and the relation $=$ is $\{a\}.$ The set in the Wolfram Alpha page has $a$ as a fixed element of $X,$ and $\{x\in X\mid x\sim a\}$ is asking for all values $x.$ In particular, $\{x\}$ wouldn't make sense for an equivalence class. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Apr 23 at 16:20
1
$\begingroup$

If the equivalence relation is the equals relation on $\mathbb{R}$, then the equivalence class of $x \in \mathbb{R}$ is $\{x\}$, the set containing only $x$.

The quotient space $\mathbb{R}/\mathord{=}$ is bijective to $\mathbb{R}$ by the mapping $x \leftrightarrow \{x\}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.