John Lee says in "Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature":

With some more sophisticated tools from algebraic topology, it can be shown that every noncompact connected smooth manifold admits a Lorentz metric, and a compact connected smooth manifold admits a Lorentz metric if and only if its Euler characteristic is zero (see [O’N83, p. 149]).

The reference is

[O’N83] Barrett O’Neill, Semi-Riemannian Geometry with Applications to General Relativity, Academic Press, New York, 1983.

But I can't get access to this book. Is there another more available reference? It could be lecture notes, does not have to be a published text.

Thank you.

  • $\begingroup$ O'Neill's text is available on libgen. $\endgroup$ – Jackozee Hakkiuz Apr 23 at 8:37

I don't know of another reference, but the proof is not too hard once you have the right tools, there are just a lot of them.

Let $\dim M = n$. We can reduce the structure group of $TM$ to $O(n)$ by choosing a Riemannian metric. If $TM$ admits an indefinite metric with signature $(p, q)$, then the structure group of $TM$ reduces to $O(p, q)$, which is an indefinite orthogonal group. Now $O(p)\times O(q)$ is a maximal compact subgroup of $O(p, q)$ and hence a deformation retract of it, so the structure group of $TM$ reduces further to $O(p)\times O(q)$. Therefore, there are vector bundles $E$ and $F$ with $\operatorname{rank} E = p$ and $\operatorname{rank} F = q$ such that $TM \cong E\oplus F$. Conversely, if $TM \cong E\oplus F$ with $\operatorname{rank} E = p$ and $\operatorname{rank} F = q$, then $TM$ admits an indefinite metric with signature $(p, q)$, for example $g = g_E - g_F$ where $g_E$ and $g_F$ are Riemannian metrics on $E$ and $F$ respectively.

The case of Lorentzian metrics corresponds to $q = 1$; some people would instead say $p = 1$, but it doesn't matter, it is equivalent. The above shows that $TM$ admits a Lorentzian metric if and only if $TM \cong E\oplus L$ where $\operatorname{rank}(E) = n - 1$ and $L$ is a real line bundle.

If $M$ is not closed, it follows from obstruction theory that $TM$ admits a nowhere zero section and hence $TM \cong E\oplus\varepsilon^1$ where $\varepsilon^1$ denotes the trivial real line bundle. Therefore $M$ admits a Lorentzian metric.

If $M$ is closed and orientable, there is a double cover${}^*$ $p : M' \to M$ associated to $L$ such that $p^*L \cong \varepsilon^1$ and hence $TM' \cong p^*TM \cong p^*E\oplus p^*L \cong p^*E\oplus\varepsilon^1$. As $M'$ is orientable, we see that $\chi(M') = 0$ by the Poincare-Hopf Theorem, but $\chi(M') = 2\chi(M)$, so $\chi(M) = 0$.

If $M$ is closed and non-orientable, let $\pi : \widetilde{M} \to M$ be the orientable double cover. Then $T\widetilde{M} \cong \pi^*TM \cong \pi^*E\oplus\pi^*L$. Applying the argument in the previous paragraph with $L$ replaced by $\pi^*L$, we see that $\chi(\widetilde{M}) = 0$, but $\chi(\widetilde{M}) = 2\chi(M)$, so $\chi(M) = 0$.

${}^*$Explicitly, $M' = S(L)$, the sphere bundle of $L$ with respect to a Riemannian metric, and $p$ is just the restriction of the projection $L \to M$ to $S(L)$. The claim follows once you know that the pullback of a vector bundle by its own projection is trivial and the normal bundle of the sphere bundle in a vector bundle is trivial; see here for the latter claim.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.