I have a question about the strong Markov property of Brownian motions.

Let $(\{X_t\}_{t \ge 0}, P_x)$ be a $d$-dimensional Brownian motion starting from $x \in \mathbb{R}^d$.

Let $\tau=\inf\{t>0 \mid |X_t-x|>r\}$, $r>0$. Here, $|\cdot|$ denotes the $d$-dimensional Euclidean norm.

In a paper, the authors claim that \begin{align*} P_{x}(\tau<t, |X_t-X_{\tau}| \ge r/2) &= \int_{0}^{t}E_{x}[P_{X_s}(|X_{t-s}-X_0| \ge r/2);\tau \in ds]. \tag{1} \end{align*} However, I do not know the proof.

By the strong Markov property, \begin{align} P_{x}(\tau<t, |X_t-X_{\tau}| \ge r/2) &=P_{x}(\tau<t, |X_{(t-\tau)+\tau}-X_{\tau}| \ge r/2) \\ &=E_{x}[P_{X_\tau}(|X_{t-\tau}-X_0| \ge r/2);\tau<t] \tag{2}. \end{align}

Can we obtain the equality (1) from the identity (2)?

  • $\begingroup$ What exactly do you mean by the notation $E_x(f(X_s); \tau \in ds)$? $\endgroup$ – saz Apr 21 at 6:58
  • $\begingroup$ @saz I think that $E_{x}[f(X_s); \tau \in ds]$ denotes the measure induced by $s \mapsto E_{x}[f(X_s); \tau \le s]$ $\endgroup$ – sharpe Apr 21 at 7:05
  • $\begingroup$ I do not understand why is (1) not a precise equality. It should be one, by the strong Markov property. $\endgroup$ – zhoraster Apr 21 at 8:26
  • $\begingroup$ @zhoroaster Sorry. (1) should be an equality. $\endgroup$ – sharpe Apr 21 at 10:35

You didn't apply the strong Markov property correctly. This is indicated by the term

$$\mathbb{P}_{X_{\tau}}(|X_{t-\tau}-X_0| \geq r/2)$$

which appears on the right-hand side of $(2)$, note that this term is not well-defined since $t-\tau$ is not a non-negative random variable (it is only non-negative on $\{\tau \leq t\}$), and therefore $X_{t-\tau}$ is not well-defined.

There is the following stronger version of the strong Markov property which is needed here, you can find it for instance in the book by Schilling & Partzsch on Brownian motion (Theorem 6.11)

Theorem Let $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$ be a $d$-dimensional Brownian motion with canonical filtration $(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t \geq 0}$. Let $\tau$ be a stopping time, and let $\eta \geq \tau$ be an $\mathcal{F}_{\tau+}$-measurable random variable. Then it holds for any bounded Borel measurable function $u$ that $$\mathbb{E}^x (u(X_{\eta}) \mid \mathcal{F}_{\tau+})(\omega) = (T_{\eta(\omega)-\tau(\omega)}u)(X_{\tau}(\omega)) \quad \text{a.s.} \tag{3}$$ where $$(T_s u)(x):= \mathbb{E}^x(u(X_s))$$

The above theorem gives the following corollary:

Corollary Under the assumptions of the theorem it holds that $$\mathbb{E}^x(f(X_{\eta},X_{\tau}) \mid \mathcal{F}_{\tau+})(\omega) = (G_{\eta(\omega)-\tau(\omega)} f)(X_{\tau}(\omega)) \quad \text{a.s.} \tag{4}$$ for any bounded Borel measurable function $f$ where $$(G_s f)(x) := \mathbb{E^x}(f(X_s,x)).$$

The idea is to prove $(4)$ first for functions of the form $f(x,y) = u(x) v(y)$ (... for such functions the assertion is a direct consequence of the above theorem and the pull out property), and then to use a density (or monotone class) argument to extend the identity to any bounded Borel measurable function $f$.

Now for the stopping time $\tau$ from your question define

$$\eta := \max\{t,\tau\}= \begin{cases} \tau, & \{\tau \geq t\}, \\ t, & \{\tau \leq t\}.\end{cases}$$

Then clearly $\eta \geq \tau$ and moreover $\eta$ is $\mathcal{F}_{\tau+}$-measurable. Using the tower property and the pull out property we find that

\begin{align*} \mathbb{P}^x(\tau<t, |X_{t}-X_{\tau}| \geq r/2) &= \mathbb{E}^x \big[ \mathbb{E}^x( 1_{\{\tau <t\}} 1_{\{|X_{t}-X_{\tau}| \geq r/2\}} \mid \mathcal{F}_{\tau+}) \big] \\ &= \mathbb{E}^x \big[ 1_{\{\tau <t\}} \mathbb{E}^x( 1_{\{|X_{t}-X_{\tau}| \geq r/2\}} \mid \mathcal{F}_{\tau+}) \big] \end{align*}

Since $$1_{\{|X_{t}-X_{\tau}| \geq r/2\}} = 1_{\{|X_{\eta}-X_{\tau}| \geq r/2\}} \tag{5}$$ we have $$\mathbb{E}^x( 1_{\{|X_{t}-X_{\tau}| \geq r/2\}} \mid \mathcal{F}_{\tau+}) = \mathbb{E}^x( 1_{\{|X_{\eta}-X_{\tau}| \geq r/2\}} \mid \mathcal{F}_{\tau+}),$$ and therefore it follows from the above corollary that

\begin{align*} \mathbb{P}^x(\tau<t, |X_{t}-X_{\tau}| \geq r/2) &= \int_{\Omega} 1_{\{\tau <t\}}(\omega) \mathbb{P}^{X_{\tau}(\omega)}(|X_{t-\tau(\omega)}-X_0| \geq r/2) \, d\mathbb{P}^x(\omega) \\ &= \int_{(0,t)} \mathbb{E}^x(\mathbb{P}^{X_s}(|X_{t-s}-X_0| \geq r/2); \tau \in ds) \end{align*}

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your kind proof. I understood. $\endgroup$ – sharpe Apr 22 at 11:45
  • $\begingroup$ I could find the stronger version of the usual strong Markov property. $\endgroup$ – sharpe Apr 22 at 11:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.