# If you get a result other than $0$ when using the limit comparison test for series, does that tell you anything?

If $$\lim_{n->\infty} a_n/b_n = c$$ and $$c>0$$, then $$a_n/b_n$$ have the same convergence behavior (i.e. if one converges the other converges and if one diverges then the other diverges).

But what if $$c$$ is less than $$0$$? Does that mean no conclusions whatsoever can be drawn? And what if $$c$$ is equal to zero?

Any help is appreciated.

If c = 0 then no conclusions can be drawn. We can demonstrate this by providing some counter examples that show the individual sequence can either converge or diverge while the ratio still converges to 0.

For example, take the numerator to be the constant sequence 0 and the denominator to be the constant sequence 1. In this case both converge individually. If you let the numerator alternate between 1 and -1, while the denominator is the sequence 1,2,3,4.... then both will individually not converge.

If c<0 then everything holds just as c>0. This follows from multiplying both sides by -1

• Thanks for the answer! Could you expand on the idea of a "constant series"? By constant series of one I'm guessing you're not meaning $\sum 1$ because that wouldn't be convergent. What were you meaning? – James Ronald Apr 17 '19 at 19:14
• Good catch. I should have said constant sequence (i.e. 0,0,0,.... and 1,1,1,......) and not series. I'll put that in the edit – RamenZzz Apr 17 '19 at 19:18

The more general then limit test: if $$b_n$$ absolutely converges, and $$\frac{a_n}{b_n}$$ is bounded, then $$a_n$$ also absolutely converges. If $$\frac{a_n}{b_n}$$ is separated from $$0$$ and $$b_n$$ doesn't converge absolutely, then $$a_n$$ doesn't converge absolutely.

In particular, if there is non-zero limit of $$\frac{a_n}{b_n}$$, then either both of them converges absolutely, or none of them. If $$\frac{a_n}{b_n} \to 0$$ and $$b_n$$ converges absolutely, then $$a_n$$ converges absolutely.

Nothing can be said about conditional convergence.