I do it like this:
$\forall n \ge 1, \; \dfrac{6n^3 + 5n - 1}{2n^3 + 2n + 8} = \dfrac{6 + 5n^{-2} - n^{-3}}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}}; \tag 1$
since it is easy to see that
$\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} (6 + 5n^{-2} - n^{-3}) = 6, \tag 2$
and
$\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} (2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3} ) = 2, \tag 3$
we have
$\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{6n^3 + 5n - 1}{2n^3 + 2n + 8} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{6 + 5n^{-2} - n^{-3}}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}} = \dfrac{\lim_{n \to \infty}( 6 + 5n^{-2} - n^{-3})}{\lim_{n \to \infty} ( 2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}) } = \dfrac{6}{2} = 3. \tag 4$
Of course, such an answer, though perfectly rigorous and on point, is bound to be less than satisfactory to readers who want, as the text of the question indicates, to see the $\epsilon$-$N$ mechanism operate in detail; what I have done here is simply invoke standard and elementary results on the behavior of limits; we may also cast things into $\epsilon$-$N$ form if we write
$\dfrac{6 + 5n^{-2} - n^{-3}}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}} - 3$
$= \dfrac{ 6 + 5n^{-2} - n^{-3} - 3( 2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3})}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}}$
$=\dfrac{5n^{-2} - n^{-3} - 6n^{-2} - 24n^{-3}}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}} = \dfrac{-n^{-2} - 25n^{-3}}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}} ; \tag 5$
$\left \vert \dfrac{6 + 5n^{-2} - n^{-3}}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}} - 3 \right \vert = \left \vert \dfrac{-n^{-2} - 25n^{-3}}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}} \right \vert; \tag 6$
it is evident via inspection of the right-hand side of this equation that, given any $\epsilon > 0$ there exists a sufficiently large $N \in \Bbb N$ that
$n > N \Longrightarrow \left \vert \dfrac{-n^{-2} - 25n^{-3}}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}} \right \vert < \epsilon, \tag 7$
which in light of (6) by definition implies
$\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{6 + 5n^{-2} - n^{-3}}{2 + 2n^{-2} + 8n^{-3}} = 3, \tag 8$
completing an $\epsilon$-$N$ demonstration of the requisite limit.
It appears to me that our OP Fatima Ens' principal error lies in
confusing the roles of $\exists$ and $\forall$ in the definition of limit; the quantifying symbol string should read
$\forall \epsilon \exists N \mid \forall n > N \; \text{and so forth}; \tag 9$
if this correction is accepted and the remaining statements bought into accord with this (corrected) version, the chances of completing a successful proof are greatly enhanced.