Exponential distribution MLE with lifetime and frequency table \begin{array}{c|c}
\hline \text{Lifetime (months)} & \text{Observed frequency} \\ 
\hline 0-2 & 50 \\ 
\hline 2-4 & 35 \\ 
\hline 4-6 & 25 \\
\hline 6-8 & 15 \\
\hline 8-10 & 5 \\
\hline >10 & 10 \\
\hline\end{array}
The above is the lifetime and frequency table of $140$ light bulbs. I would like to calculate the MLE of $\lambda $.
I plan to use this formula:
$$\lambda = \frac{n}{x_1+x_2 + \ldots + x_n}$$
, where $x_1$ means the lifetime of first bulb but I only know the lifetime of the first bulb is between $0$ to $2$ months so how can I solve this question? Thank you in advance.
 A: The probability (not density) that a lightbulb fails between time $a$ and time $b$ is $e^{-\lambda a} - e^{-\lambda b} = e^{-\lambda a} \left(1 - e^{-\lambda (b-a)}\right)$ The probability it fails after time $c$ is $e^{-\lambda c}$. But this will not lead to a simple expression for the maximum likelihood estimator, so you could resort to numerical methods; it seems to me that using this approach on your data, the calculation would produce $\hat{\lambda}$ of about $0.25039$ 
The simple alternative is an approximation and then take your simple expression.  You might for example say that the representative figure for the first interval of $0-2$ is the midpoint of $1$, and similarly for the second interval of $2-4$ is $3$, etc.  (For an exponential distribution, there is a good reason to think these might be slightly too high, but let's not worry about that now)  
You would still need to choose a representative figure for the top range of above $10$ which theoretically heads off to infinity: personally I would have thought $12$ might be reasonable here, though others may have their own approach.  Then your expression would give $\hat{\lambda} = \frac{50+35+ 25 + 15 +5  + 10 }{50\times 1+35 \times 3+ 25 \times 5 + 15 \times 7+5 \times 9 + 10 \times 12} =\frac{140}{550} \approx 0.2545$, not too far from my earlier calculation in the context of the ranges (and apparent rounding to $5$) in the original data  
