3
$\begingroup$

Today I heard in a lecture (some video on YouTube) that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of the matrix.

I am not able to understand the above statement. I know that determinant is a special function which assign to each $x$ in $\mathbb K^{n \times n}$ a scalar. This is the intuitive idea. And this map is not linear as well. One way to see this is to consider the fact that determinant of $cA$ is $c^n\det(A)$

Can someone please explain what did the person mean by saying that the determinant is linear as a function of each of the rows of matrix?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I got it. It means that elementary row operations have a linear effect on determinant. Say $A=(r1,r2,...,r_n)$ is a matrix then det of $(r_1,..,cr_j +r_i,..,r_n)$ is nothing but determinant of $(r_1,..,cr_j,..,r_n)$ plus determinant of $(r_1,..,r_i,..,r_n)$.Am I right? $\endgroup$ – StammeringMathematician Apr 16 at 3:40
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. The fact that is is linear in each row separately gives rise to the combinatorial formula for the determinant. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Apr 16 at 3:41
6
$\begingroup$

If $r_1, \ldots r_n$ are the rows of the matrix and $r_i = sa+tb$, where $s,t$ are scalars and $a,b$ are row vectors, then you have

$$\det\begin{pmatrix}r_1 \\ \vdots \\r_i \\ \vdots \\ r_n\end{pmatrix} = \det\begin{pmatrix}r_1 \\ \vdots \\ sa+tb \\ \vdots \\ r_n\end{pmatrix} = s\det\begin{pmatrix}r_1 \\ \vdots \\ a \\ \vdots \\ r_n\end{pmatrix} + t\det\begin{pmatrix}r_1 \\ \vdots \\ b \\ \vdots \\ r_n\end{pmatrix}$$

This holds for any row $i=1,\ldots , n$. And similarly this also applies to columns.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Let $M$ be an $n\times n$ matrix with rows $\mathbf{r}_1,\dots,\mathbf{r}_n$. Then we may think of the determinant as a function of the rows $$ \det(M)=\det(\mathbf{r}_1,\dots,\mathbf{r}_n). $$ To say that $\det$ is a linear function of the rows means that if we scale a single row by $c$, the result is scaled by $c$; that is, $$ \det(\mathbf{r}_1,\dots,\mathbf{r}_{i-1},c\mathbf{r}_i,\mathbf{r}_{i+1}\dots\mathbf{r}_n)=c\det(\mathbf{r}_1,\dots,\mathbf{r}_n). $$ Similarly if we fix all but one row (say the first), we obtain $$ \det(\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_2,\dots,\mathbf{r}_n)=\det(\mathbf{x},\dots,\mathbf{r}_n)+\det(\mathbf{r}_1,\dots,\mathbf{r}_n). $$ Your mistake was that you scale all the rows at once; to be linear, you can only do things "one at a time"

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.