Let $(M,g)$ be a Riemannian manifold and $g$ the Riemannian metric in coordinates $g=g_{\alpha \beta}dx^{\alpha} \otimes dx^{\beta}$, where $x^{i}$ are local coordinates on $M$. Denote by $g^{\alpha \beta}$ the inverse components of the inverse metric $g^{-1}$. Let $\nabla$ be the Levi-Civita connection of the metric $g$. Consider, locally, the function $\det((g_{\alpha \beta})_{\alpha \beta})$. It is known that $\nabla \det((g_{\alpha \beta})_{\alpha \beta}) = 0$ by using normal coordinates etc...

I would like to show this fact without using normal coordinates. Just by computation. Here is what I have so far:

$$\nabla \det((g_{\alpha \beta})_{\alpha \beta}) = \left [ g^{\gamma \delta} \partial_{\delta} \det((g_{\alpha \beta})_{\alpha \beta}) \right ] \partial_{\gamma} = \left [ \det((g_{\alpha \beta})_{\alpha \beta}) g^{\gamma \delta} g^{\beta \alpha} \partial_{\delta} g_{\alpha \beta}\right ] \partial_{\gamma}.$$

Here: the first equality sign follows from the definition of the gradient of a function and the second equality sign is the derivative of the determinant.

Question: How do I continue from here without using normal coordinates? Or are there any mistakes? If yes, where and which?

  • $\begingroup$ Is $\det g$ really a well-defined function on $M$? $\endgroup$ Apr 14 '19 at 10:43
  • $\begingroup$ It is not defined on the whole of $M$, only in a chart. $\endgroup$
    – Phillip
    Apr 14 '19 at 11:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I meant to say the claim that the gradient of det g is zero is false. You are requiring the function to be constant, but you have no restriction on g whatsoever. $g= x dx^2$ defined on some open interval of $\mathbb R$ will be a counterexample. $\endgroup$ Apr 14 '19 at 11:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It seems like you are confusing covariant derivative with gradient. These are two different concepts, even though both are denoted by $\nabla$. $\endgroup$ Apr 14 '19 at 12:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Amitai I thaught that building the gradient of a function also gives you a tensor, a (1,0)-tensor. $\endgroup$
    – Phillip
    Apr 14 '19 at 13:14

One can give a short proof by considering the reciprocal basis $\partial^k=g^{k\sigma}\partial_{\sigma}$ and its derivative $\nabla_{\partial_k}\partial^j=-\Gamma^{j}{}_{ks}\partial^s$, because if we represent the metric tensor as $$g=g^{st}\partial_s\otimes\partial_t$$ then \begin{eqnarray*} g&=&g^{st}\partial_s\otimes\partial_t\\ &=&\partial_s\otimes g^{st}\partial_t\\ &=&\partial_s\otimes\partial^s. \end{eqnarray*}

So \begin{eqnarray*} \nabla_{\partial_k}g&=&\nabla_{\partial_k}(\partial_s\otimes\partial^s)\\ &=&(\nabla_{\partial_k}\partial_s)\otimes\partial^s+\partial_s\otimes\nabla_{\partial_k}\partial^s\\ &=&\Gamma^r{}_{ks}\partial_r\otimes\partial^s-\partial_s\otimes \Gamma^s{}_{kr}\partial^r\\ &=&\Gamma^r{}_{ks}\partial_r\otimes\partial^s-\Gamma^s{}_{kr}\partial_s\otimes \partial^r\\ &=&\Gamma^r{}_{ks}\partial_r\otimes\partial^s-\Gamma^r{}_{ks}\partial_r\otimes \partial^s\\ &=&0. \end{eqnarray*}

  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand the downvote. $\endgroup$ Oct 23 '20 at 10:28
  • $\begingroup$ @GiuseppeNegro: neither I do $\endgroup$
    – janmarqz
    Oct 23 '20 at 16:39

Calculate $\Gamma^\nu_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}g^{\nu\kappa}(\partial_\mu g_{\nu\kappa}+\partial_\nu g_{\mu\kappa}-\partial_\kappa g_{\mu\nu})=\frac{1}{2}g^{\nu\kappa}\partial_\mu g_{\nu\kappa}$. Using the well known formula $$ \det A^{-1}\frac{d}{dt}\det A=\text{Tr}\left(A^{-1}\frac{d A}{dt}\right), $$ we obtain $$ \Gamma_\mu\equiv\Gamma^\nu_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{g}\partial_\mu g=\frac{1}{2}\partial_\mu\ln|g|=\partial_\mu\ln \sqrt{|g|}, $$ where $g$ denotes the determinant of the matrix with elements $g_{\mu\nu}$.

The expression $\rho=\sqrt{|g|}$ transforms under a change of chart as follows: We have $g_{\mu^\prime \nu^\prime}=\partial_{\mu^\prime}x^\mu\partial_{\nu^\prime}x^\nu g_{\mu\nu}=J^\mu_{\mu^\prime}J^\nu_{\nu^\prime}g_{\mu\nu}$, taking determinants gives $$ g^\prime=\det J^2g \\ \sqrt{|g^\prime|}=|\det J|\sqrt{|g|}. $$ This object is called a "scalar density of weight 1". It makes sense in a coordinate-free manner too as a section of the density bundle, but whatever. One can show that the components of the covariant derivative of such an object is $$\nabla_\mu\rho=\partial_\mu\rho-\Gamma_\mu\rho=\partial_\mu\rho-\partial_\mu\ln\sqrt{|g|}\rho.$$ Inserting $\rho=\sqrt{|g|}$ gives $$ \nabla_\mu\sqrt{|g|}=\partial_\mu\sqrt{|g|}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{|g|}}\partial_\mu\sqrt{|g|}\sqrt{|g|}=\partial_\mu\sqrt{|g|}-\partial_\mu\sqrt{|g|}=0. $$

  • $\begingroup$ Why the downvote? $\endgroup$ Oct 23 '20 at 9:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.