In Görtz and Wedhorn's AGI (3.4)

Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $x ∈ X$, and let $U \subset X$ be an affine open neighborhood of $x$, say $U = \mathop{Spec} A$. Denote by $p \subset A$ the prime ideal of $A$ corresponding to $x$. Then $\mathcal{O}_{X,x} = \mathcal{O}_{U,x} = A_p$, and the natural homomorphism $A \to A_p$ gives us a morphism $$j_x \colon \mathop{Spec} \mathcal{O}_{X,x} = \mathop{Spec} A_p \to \mathop{Spec}A = U \subset X $$ of schemes. By Proposition 3.2 (2) this morphism is independent of the choice of $U$.

The Proposition 3.2 (2) is the following:

Let $X$ be a scheme. The affine open subscheme are a basis of the topology.

My question: Why is this morphism independent of the choice of $U$?


Let's start with the Affine Communication Lemma

Let $X$ be a scheme. $U, \ V$ are open affine subschemes of $X$. Then given $x \in U \cap V \ \ \exists W \subset U \cap V$ such that $x \in W$ is distinguished open in both $U$ and $V$.

So in your case you get two morphisms $$ j_1 : Spec \ \mathcal O_{X,x} \rightarrow U$$ and $$ j_2 : Spec \ \mathcal O_{X,x} \rightarrow V $$

Since $ W$ is a distinguished open affine in $U$ the first morphism factors through $$ Spec \ \mathcal O_{X,x} \rightarrow W \to U$$ and the second factors through $$ Spec \ \mathcal O_{X,x} \rightarrow W \to V$$.

The first arrow in both the factors is the same morphism by commutativity while the second is just inclusion in both cases. So the composition gives you the same morphism.

  • $\begingroup$ You don't really need distinguished affine if you know $$Mor(X,Y) \simeq Hom_{Rings} (\Gamma (Y,\mathcal O(Y)) , \Gamma (X,\mathcal O(X) ) )$$ if Y is affine. $\endgroup$ – Ignorant Mathematician Apr 14 at 6:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.