0
$\begingroup$

Let $X_t$ be collected from a Binomial distribution with parameters $N_t$ and $P_t$, where $N_t$ is known for $t= 1, 2, \dots , T$. On the other hand, $P_t \sim \operatorname{Beta}(\alpha_t, \beta_t)$. Using an Empirical Bayes estimation, we are interested in getting an estimate of $\alpha_t$ and $\beta_t$ based on the observations of $x_t$ we have.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to MSE! What are your thoughts? In which context did this question arise? Where are you stuck? $\endgroup$ Mar 2 '13 at 5:07
  • $\begingroup$ Sure you want the Beta distributions to depend on $t$? If so, one wants to estimate two parameters based on a single observation--a tad too optimistic, don't you think? $\endgroup$
    – Did
    Mar 3 '13 at 8:49
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it depends on t. That's why one uses Moment methods in EB. $\endgroup$
    – Bromideh
    Mar 6 '13 at 4:51
  • $\begingroup$ I thought the combo (two parameters to estimate+one observation) would strike you as absurd. $\endgroup$
    – Did
    Mar 7 '13 at 9:03
1
$\begingroup$

I think the question itself shows a lot of confusion. If you want EB estimates of0 $P_t$, you pretty much have to put a common prior on all $P_t$, i.e., $\alpha$ and $\beta$ cannot depend on $t$. If you want $\alpha$ and $\beta$ to depend on $t$, then perhaps you will need another level of prior on $\alpha_t$ and $\beta_t$. Even so, your set up has a potential identifiability problem, but the key is that, eventually, you need a common prior for all $t$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.