1
$\begingroup$

I've got the following equation:

$\lambda + e^{-\lambda} = 3$

$3 - \lambda = \frac{1}{e^{\lambda}}$

$\frac{1}{3-\lambda} = e^{\lambda}$

Now, I take the natural log of both sides:

$ln(\frac{1}{3-\lambda}) = \lambda$

$ln(1) - ln(3-\lambda) = \lambda$

Since $ln(1)$ is zero,

$-ln(3 - \lambda) = \lambda$

I get to this part of the equation and I feel stuck and that I cannot simplify and solve for lambda even more. Could someone help me? Obviously I can use a graphing calculator to find the solution (2.9475309 I believe being one of them), but I would like to learn how to solve this by hand as well. Thank you in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You will need a numerical method $\endgroup$ – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner Apr 10 at 16:20
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This isn't solvable with just conventional arithmetic, exponentials and logarithms. You need the Lambert $W$ function. $\endgroup$ – Arthur Apr 10 at 16:21
0
$\begingroup$

This is an example of equation, for which we know there is an explicit solution in terms of well-known Lambert $\operatorname{W}$ function.

\begin{align} x + \exp(-x)&= 3 \tag{1}\label{1} ,\\ x\exp(x) + 1&= 3\exp(x) ,\\ x\exp(x)-3\exp(x)&=-1 ,\\ (x-3)\exp(x)&=-1 ,\\ (x-3)\exp(x-3+3)&=-1 ,\\ (x-3)\exp(x-3)\exp(3)&=-1 ,\\ (x-3)\exp(x-3)&=-\exp(-3) . \end{align}

The last expression is ready to apply the Lambert $\operatorname{W}$ function:

\begin{align} \operatorname{W}((x-3)\exp(x-3))&=\operatorname{W}(-\exp(-3)) ,\\ x-3&=\operatorname{W}(-\exp(-3)) ,\\ x&=3+\operatorname{W}(-\exp(-3)) \tag{2}\label{2} . \end{align}

Equation \eqref{2} provides a general solution in terms of Lambert $\operatorname{W}$ function, and since we are interested in real solutions, we need to check the argument of $\operatorname{W}$.

In this case it is $-\exp(-3)$, which is between $-\exp(-1)$ and $0$. This condition guarantees that there are two real solutions, corresponding to so-called branches of the Lambert $\operatorname{W}$ function, which has special names $\operatorname{W_{0}}$ and $\operatorname{W_{-1}}$:

\begin{align} x_0&=3+\operatorname{W_{0}}(-\exp(-3)) \approx \phantom{-}2.94753090254 ,\\ x_{-1}&=3+\operatorname{W_{-1}}(-\exp(-3)) \approx -1.50524149579 . \end{align}

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Newton-Raphson method may be handy here for finding numerical solutions. Define $f(x)=x+e^{-x}-3$. Notice that we're actually solving $f(x)=0$.

$$x_{n+1}=x_n-\dfrac{x_n+e^{-x_n}-3}{1-e^{-x_n}} \land x_0=3$$

$$\begin{array}{|p{3cm}||p{3cm}|p{3cm}|p{3cm}|}\hline n & x_n \\ \hline 0 & 3 \\ 1 & 2.94760430351\\ 2& 2.94753090269\\3&2.94753090254\\\hline \end{array}$$

There is also a negative solution existence of which somehow makes sense because of the $e^{-x}$ term. As $x$ decreases, $e^{-x}$ increases. In fact it calls for the existence of a value such that $x$ decreases and $e^{-x}$ increases in such a way that they nullify the $+3$ term of the equation providing a negative solution.

Let $x'$ denote the second solution. Again using the first iteration formula but now with $x'_0=-3$. We get the following iterations: $$\begin{array}{|p{3cm}||p{3cm}|p{3cm}|p{3cm}|}\hline n & x'_n \\ \hline 0 & -3 \\ 1 & −2.26197848246\\ 2& −1.75743824023\\3&−1.54063495725\\\hline \end{array}$$


Aliter:

We can do a substitution of variables to make it satisfy being of the form wherein we can use Lambert's $W$ function.

Let $-t=x-3$. Now we have $tp^t=e^3$ which has solution $t=-W(-e^3)$ and so $x$ is $3-t$ or simply $x=3+W(-e^3)$.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Considering that you look for the zero's of $$f(x)=x+e^{-x}-3$$ notice that the fist derivative cancels at $x=0$. To have an idea about the location of the roots, perform a Taylor expansion to get $$f(x)=-2+\frac{x^2}{2}+O\left(x^3\right)$$ Ignoring higher order terms, this gives as approximate solutions $x_{\pm}=\pm 2$ that you can use as starting guesses for Newton method $$\left( \begin{array}{cc} n & x_n \\ 0 & 2.00000 \\ 1 & 3.00000 \\ 2 & 2.94760 \\ 3 & 2.94753 \end{array} \right)$$ $$\left( \begin{array}{cc} n & x_n \\ 0 & -2.00000 \\ 1 & -1.62607 \\ 2 & -1.51397 \\ 3 & -1.50529 \\ 4 & -1.50524 \end{array} \right)$$

You have much better guesses building around $x=0$ the $[2,n]$ Padé approximant of the function. It will write $$f(x) \sim \frac{-2+a_1^{(n)}x+a_2^{(n)}x^2}{1+\sum_{k=1}^n b_k x^k}$$ and then solve the numerator (simple).

As a function of $n$, the following table gives the decimal representation of the guesses $$\left( \begin{array}{ccc} n & x_-^{(n)}& x_+^{(n)} \\ 2 & -1.50000& 3.00000 \\ 3 & -1.50624& 2.95069 \\ 4 & -1.50554& 2.93996 \\ 5 & -1.50524& 2.94888 \\ 6 & -1.50523& 2.94834 \end{array} \right)$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.