3
$\begingroup$

I have an expression in terms of $(x,y,z)$ that is actually a sphere as per Mathematica but I am unable to bring it to the form $(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2 +(z-c)^2=r^2$.

Here is the equation I have. Let $(x_o,y_0,0)$ and $(r_0,0,0)$ be the two points and $C$ be the scaling factor/constant and $(x,y,z)$ is any point fulfilling a certain condition, then

$$C[(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 +z^2]=[(x-r_0)^2+y^2+z^2]^2$$

I am interested in finding the center and the radius of the sphere $(x,y,z)$.

Here is what I have from Mathematica.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why do you think it's a sphere? It's not. $\endgroup$ – zipirovich Apr 9 at 3:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is a fourth degree equation, hence not a sphere. $\endgroup$ – user376343 Apr 9 at 9:27
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your comments. I have added a snapshot from Mathematica. The fourth degree gives an impression as if the equation would not be of sphere but what I noticed is that higher the degree smaller the radius is. $\endgroup$ – Rabe Arshad Apr 9 at 20:48
1
$\begingroup$

The solution set of your equation may look like a sphere, but looks can be deceiving.

That said, the (real) solution set of the fourth-degree equation $$\left(\;(x+1)^2+(y+2)^2+(z+3)^2+4\;\right)\cdot\left(\;(x-1)^2+(y-2)^2+(z-3)^2-4\;\right)=0$$ is a sphere, because the first factor is always non-zero and can be divided-out. Could that be happening with your equation?

Well ... If your figure were a sphere, then it should be symmetric in (at least) all the coordinate directions. It's certainly symmetric in the $z$ direction (since all instances of $z$ are even powers). What about the $x$ direction? Suppose we substitute some values into your $C=2$ case:

$$\begin{align} y=1, z=0 &\quad\to\quad \text{(real) } x \approx -1.3048 \text{ or } 2.8461 \quad\to\quad \text{midpoint } x \approx 0.7706 \\ y=0, z=1 &\quad\to\quad \text{(real) } x \approx -1.5955 \text{ or } 3.2574 \quad\to\quad \text{midpoint } x \approx 0.8309 \\ \end{align}$$

(I used Mathematica to find the solutions.) Since the midpoint $x$ values don't match, the solution set is not symmetric in the $x$ direction. This is definitely not a sphere. $\square$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @Blue. I'm convinced with what you just said. However, do you see any approximation technique that could make it a sphere as shown in the Mathematica. Also, did you use "Simplify" and/or "Solve" functions to find the solution in Mathematica? $\endgroup$ – Rabe Arshad Apr 9 at 22:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You could, for instance, take appropriate partial derivatives and such to find extremal $x$, $y$, $z$ values, and determine the ellipsoid that fits the bounding box. (For details on such a strategy, you should ask a separate question.) As for solving with Mathematica, I simply defined f[x_, y_, z_] := 2((x-2)^2+(y-4)^2+z^2)-((x-1)^2+y^2+z^2)^2, then entered NSolve[f[x,1,0]==0, x] and NSolve[f[x,0,1]==0, x]. $\endgroup$ – Blue Apr 9 at 22:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.