3
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathfrak m$ be a maximal ideal of $R$ and $M$ an $R$-module such that $\mathfrak mM\ne M$. Is it true that $\mathfrak mM$ is a maximal submodule of $M$? Thank you.

(I can see this happen in case $M$ is cyclic.)

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Of course not! Take $M=R^2$. Then $M/\mathfrak mM$ is an $R/\mathfrak m$-vectorspace of dimension $2$, so there is a proper subspace $N/\mathfrak mM$ of $M/\mathfrak mM$. This shows that $\mathfrak mM\subset N\subset M$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, $M=\left\langle(1,0)+mM,(0,1)+mM \right\rangle $. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – Q.TL Mar 1 '13 at 12:26
  • $\begingroup$ @ YACP. In case $M$ is radical (i.e. $M$ has no maximal submodule), does we have $mM=M$? (m is maximal ideal of $R$) $\endgroup$ – Q.TL Mar 1 '13 at 12:35
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't it even more instructive to consider the case of $R$ being a field and M be an vector space of dimension greater 1. I know it is a special case of your example but it's simpler. $\endgroup$ – Curufin Mar 1 '13 at 14:18
  • $\begingroup$ @user63895 Have you seen this topic? $\endgroup$ – user26857 Mar 1 '13 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ @ YACP. Thanks you. $\endgroup$ – Q.TL Mar 2 '13 at 2:55
0
$\begingroup$

For $\mathfrak{m}=0$ the question is: Is $\{0\}$ a maximal subspace in every nontrivial vector space? And this is only true in the 1-dimensional case.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.