Using a conjectured formula of mine I believe the following relation to be true:

$$ (\int_0^\infty e^{-x^\lambda} dx)^\lambda = \lim_{s \to 1} \frac{1}{\zeta(s)} (\sum_{x_\lambda=1}^\infty \dots\sum_{x_2 =1}^\infty \sum_{x_1 =1}^\infty)\frac{1}{ (\sum_{k=1}^\lambda (x_k)^\lambda)^s} $$

where $\lambda$ is any positive integer $\geq 1$ and $\zeta(s)$ is the zeta function.

Can someone prove/disprove(or find a counter-example) this formula?


It's derivation using the conjecture is quite similar to: What is the limit of this Dirichlet series?

  • $\begingroup$ Reason for downvote? $\endgroup$ – More Anonymous Apr 3 at 22:42
  • $\begingroup$ What does $x_n$ mean here? $\endgroup$ – stuart stevenson Apr 3 at 23:04
  • $\begingroup$ $x_n$ is a bound variable ... All $x_i$ are summed from $1$ to $\infty$ $\endgroup$ – More Anonymous Apr 3 at 23:07

For $n \in \Bbb{Z}^m$ let $d_m(n) = \sum_{j=1}^m |n_j|^m$ then $$\Gamma(s)\sum_{n \in \Bbb{Z}^m - (0)} d_m(n)^{-s} = \int_0^\infty \sum_{n \in \Bbb{Z}^m - (0)} t^{s-1}e^{-d_m(n) t}dt = \int_0^\infty ( \theta_m(t)^m-1) dt$$ Where $$\theta_m(t) = \sum_{k \in \Bbb{Z}}e^{-t |k|^m}$$

From $$\int_0^\infty t^{s-1} (\theta_m(t)-1) dt = \Gamma(s) 2\zeta(sm)$$ We know as $t \to 0^+$ $$ \theta_m(t)-1 = Res(\Gamma(s) 2\zeta(sm),s=1/m)(1+O(t^\epsilon))= t^{-1/m} \frac{2\Gamma(1/m)}{m} +t^{\epsilon-1/m}$$ Therefore $$\theta_m(t)^m = t^{-1} (\frac{2\Gamma(1/m)}{m})^m +O(t^{\epsilon-1})$$ So that $$\Gamma(s) \sum_{n \in \Bbb{Z}^m - (0)} d_m(n)^{-s}$$ has a simple pole at $s = 1$ of residue $(\frac{2\Gamma(1/m)}{m})^m$

And $ \sum_{n \in \Bbb{Z}_{\ge 1}^m } d_m(n)^{-s}$ has a simple pole at $s=1$ of residue $(\frac{\Gamma(1/m)}{m})^m = (\int_0^\infty e^{-t^m}dt)^m$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.