1
$\begingroup$

Teacher proved it like this:

enter image description here

Very elegant (way simpler than most of the ones I find online), but I'm still not convinced -- particularly the last two steps or so, where the absolute value on the left-hand side seems to disappear.

Any thoughts?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hint: What's the absolute value of a nonnegative number? $\endgroup$ – Ennar Apr 2 at 17:36
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ It is so elegant that it is wrong. If $\cos \theta$ is negative, then $\frac{n}{\cos \theta}\ge n$ is false. Besides, the fact that you can write $$\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}=|a||b|\cos \theta$$ relies on the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, so this reasoning (if it were correct) would be circular. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Apr 2 at 17:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Ennar: But how do we know the dot product of vectors a and b IS nonnegative? Dot products can sometimes be negative, after all. $\endgroup$ – Will Apr 2 at 17:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @GiuseppeNegro: Let's be charitable and assume that there might have been a transcription error, and the actual claim is that $\frac{n}{| \cos \theta |} \ge n$ if $n \ge 0$. Then the remainder of the argument follows, although the reasoning is, as you point out, fundamentally circular. $\endgroup$ – John Hughes Apr 2 at 17:55
  • $\begingroup$ How did the teacher define $\vec a\cdot\vec b $, $\lVert\vec a\rVert $ and $\theta $? $\endgroup$ – user Apr 3 at 5:22
2
$\begingroup$

given that $a\cdot b= \|a\|\cdot \|b\|\cos(\theta)$ we have that $$|a\cdot b|= \|a\|\cdot \|b\||\cos(\theta)|$$ (since the length of a vector is always non-negative).

Noting that $|\cos(\theta)|\leq 1$ we can have that:

  1. $|\cos(\theta)|=1$ which implies that $|a\cdot b|\leq\|a\|\cdot \|b\|$ is satisfied with equality.
  2. $|\cos(\theta)|<1$ which implies that $|a\cdot b|<\|a\|\cdot \|b\|$

The latter proves the statement.

$$|a\cdot b| \leq \|a\|\cdot \|b\|$$


EDIT: As pointed out by @user in the comments down below, there's no sense in moving the $|\cos(\theta)|$ to the denominator as your teacher suggested, cause nothing prevents you to have $\theta=\frac{\pi}2$ implying that $\cos(\theta)=0$. It's better to keep it on the other side and deriving the conclusion from there.

Disclaimer I think you should,nevertheless, consider what @jose-carlos-santos and @giuseppe-negro are pointing out, that actually this is a circular reasoning, and hence not a valid proof.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why does the fact that cosine is less than or equal to one imply the final statement? I don't quite follow. $\endgroup$ – Will Apr 2 at 17:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I've edited the answer to be more clear $\endgroup$ – RScrlli Apr 2 at 17:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why should one divide both sides of the equality by $|\cos\theta|$ introducing possible singularity? This step is absolutely excessive even assuming that both expressions $\vec a\cdot\vec b=\lVert\vec a\rVert\,\lVert\vec b\rVert\cos\theta $ and $-1\le\cos\theta\le1$ are "given". $\endgroup$ – user Apr 3 at 5:16
  • $\begingroup$ I was just replicating the proof given in the sketch of his professor. $\endgroup$ – RScrlli Apr 3 at 5:55
8
$\begingroup$

This proof assumes that $\vec a.\vec b$ can be written as $\left\lVert\vec a\right\rVert.\left\lVert\vec b\right\rVert.\cos\theta$ for some number $\theta$. This is the same thing as asserting that $\left\lvert\vec a.\vec b\right\rvert\leqslant\left\lVert\vec a\right\rVert.\left\lVert\vec b\right\rVert$, and this is precisely the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, which is what you want to prove. There is therefore a circular reasoning here.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.