0
$\begingroup$

While reading a section on orthogonal matrices, where $\vec{u}_1, ..., \vec{u}_n$ is an orthonormal set of vectors, I find the equation

$$(\vec{u}_1\vec{u}_1^t + ... + \vec{u}_n\vec{u}_n^t)\vec{x}= \begin{bmatrix} | & ... & | \\ \vec{u}_1 & ... & \vec{u}_n \\ | & ... & | \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} -\vec{u}_1^t-\\ ...\\ -\vec{u}_n^t-\end{bmatrix}\vec{x}$$

Now I'm familiar with summarizing a linear combination of vectors by a matrix-vector product, but in doing so I use my concept of the dot product between a row vector in the matrix and the column vector written to the right. This is related to how, in the matrix product, you're basically doing a bunch of dot-products between rows in the left matrix and columns in the right.

Here is something different though, and I'm not sure how I ought to think about it. The columns are written in the left matrix and rows in the right. I don't see how this is consistent with the dot-product view of matrix products. I could chase indices by thinking of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products, but I feel like the author intends for a better more natural way of understanding this equation.

So is there a good column-row understanding of matrix products, which makes the above equation sensible? Or is the only good way of understanding this by thinking in terms of the coordinate-wise definition of matrix products?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

This can be written as $$ \pmatrix{ \vec u_1 & \cdots & \vec u_n} \left[ \pmatrix{ \vec u_1^T \\ \vdots \\ \vec u_n^T} \vec x \right], $$ where the product in brackets are dot products of $x$ and vectors $u_i$. The resulting numbers are then used to get a linear combination of the vectors $u_i$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.