Given a Cauchy sequence of functions $\{f_n(x)\}$, it is obvious that it converges pointwise to some function $f(x)$. To prove uniform convergence, the standard argument goes as follows:
Let $\varepsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for all $m,n \geq N$, $|f_n(x)-f_m(x)|<\varepsilon$. Fix $n$ and take $m \to \infty$. Since $f_m(x) \to f(x)$, it follows that $|f_n(x)-f(x)| \leq \varepsilon$ for all $n \geq N$ and $x \in E$.
I don't find the "take the limit of $m$ to infinity" part rigorous enough because $f_m(x) \to f(x)$ is only pointwise and depends on $x$. How can we derive a conclusion of for all $x \in E$ then? What am I missing here? It also sounds a bit like heuristics and not really Analysis. How to make the argument formal?