1
$\begingroup$

Q): Suppose that you wish to sample $12$ observations randomly from a uniform distribution on the interval $(0,2)$. An approximate value of the probability that the average of your sample will be less than $0.5$.

what i did was i found the $\mathbb E(x)$ to be $1$ and variance to be $1/3$ and then i wasnt sure where to go with this so i decided to do the $z$-formula of $(0.5-1)/\sqrt{1/3}/\sqrt{12}$ to get me $z = -3$ then i got $p= 0.001350$ from that , i was just wondering if that was correct.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Please do not use pictures for critical portions of your post. Pictures may not be legible, cannot be searched and are not view-able to some, such as those who use screen readers. $\endgroup$ – Brian Mar 28 at 12:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Your approximation to an answer is correct. $\endgroup$ – NCh Mar 28 at 13:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Simulation in R: a = replicate(10^6, mean(runif(12, 0, 2))); mean(a < .5) returns 0.000979, accurate to about 3 places and agrees with $\approx 0.001$ from good normal approx. $\endgroup$ – BruceET Mar 28 at 15:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BruceET -but how many simulations would you need to distinguish between $0.001350$ and $0.001007$? $\endgroup$ – Henry Mar 28 at 16:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Henry. I was just doing a 'reality check' on a tail probability so far out. With a million iterations it's $.001 \pm 0.0006.$ Maybe $10^7$ or $10^8$ would settle it, But the point is that the normal aprx should be good enough--even with an avg of only 12. $\endgroup$ – BruceET Mar 28 at 18:25
3
$\begingroup$

The expectation of a single sample is $1$, with variance $\frac13$, so the average of twelve samples has an expectation of $1$ and variance of $\frac{1}{36}$, saying (as you found) that for this average $0.5$ would be $3$ standard deviations below the mean. For a standard normal distribution, you are correct that the probability of values less than $3$ standard deviations below the mean is about $0.00135$

The difficult question is whether a normal approximation is a good approximation in this case: in particular normal approximations can sometimes perform relatively poorly in the tails

Your question actually involves a Bates distribution, but it is easier to handle translating it to the Irwing-Hall distribution: you want the probability that the sum of $12$ uniform i.i.d. random variables on $[0,1]$ is less than $3$. This is $$\frac{1}{12!}\left({12 \choose 0}(3-0)^{12} - {12 \choose 1}(3-1)^{12} + {12 \choose 2}(3-2)^{12}- {12 \choose 3}(3-3)^{12}\right) \approx 0.001007$$

So the exact answer is rather less than the normal approximation. Whether the normal approximation is good enough, I leave for you to judge

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.