Form relation inside set $ A = \{1,2,3\} $ so that $\text{R}:\text{A}\leftrightarrow \text{A}$

Attempt to solve

I know that $\text{R}:\text{A}\leftrightarrow \text{A}$ is true when relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. Which means when

$$ \underbrace{(\forall x \in A : xRx)}_{\text{relfexive}} \wedge \underbrace{(\forall x,y \in A : xRy \implies yRx )}_{\text{symmetric}}\wedge \underbrace{(\forall x,y,z \in A : (xRy \wedge yRz \implies xRz))}_{\text{transitive}}$$ $$ \implies \underbrace{\text{R}:\text{A}\leftrightarrow \text{A}}_{\text{equivalence relation}} $$

I could try to form binary relation explicitly $\forall x \in A$.

Example of symmetric binary relation:

$$ R = \{ \langle 1,1 \rangle, \langle 2,2 \rangle, \langle 3,3 \rangle \} $$

Example of symmetric relation, which is also transitive

$$ R = \{ \langle 1, 2 \rangle, \langle 2,3 \rangle \rangle, \langle 3 ,1 \rangle \}$$

So by combining these two i get relation that is equivalence relation?

$$ R = \{ \langle 1,1 \rangle, \langle 2,2 \rangle, \langle 3,3 \rangle ,\langle 1, 2 \rangle, \langle 2,3 \rangle \rangle, \langle 3 ,1 \rangle \} $$ I'am not quite sure if this is right? If someone could clarify on what is going on since i don't think i quite understand this yet.

For example I don't understand why reflexive + symmetric + transitive would make relation equivalence relation?


This (reflexive, symmetric, transitive) is just the definition of an equivalence relation.

Note that your relation is not an equivalence relation because if $(1,2)\in R$, then it must be true that $(2,1)\in R$ as well (similar for the other elements).

The easiest example of a non-empty equivalence relation over $A$ would be $\{(1,1)\}$; or the set containing all possible pairs in $A\times A$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.