I am new here and I am not sure if this is the correct place to ask this question.

It seems like a simple probability question but I am stuck on it. It is a problem I am trying to solve.

Lets say I have 43 bets. The probability of a bet winning is 0.64. The probability of a bet losing is 0.36.

What is the probability that 29 of those 43 bets will be losing/losers?

I worked it out like this:

29 / 43 = 67% 0.36 * 67 = 24.12% chance that 29 of those 43 bets will be losing/losers.

But this seems very simplistic and incorrect to me. Because for example - when the number of bets goes up e.g. 43 goes up to 100 bets. The probability that 29 of those 100 bets losing goes down to say 10.44%. Which seems wrong to me. Because I think if the number of bets goes up, then the probability of losing a fixed number of 29 should also go up, as there are higher "chances" of losing.

Could you list the correct answer, working out and possibly a link where I can read to learn more.

I did read up on this, but there were so many ways of achieving this. I read about Binomial distributions etc, but the answers I kept calculating just seemed very wrong to me.

Many Thanks!


Let's indicate with $1$ a victory and with $0$ a loss. We can create so a bijection between all the possible results of a series of $43$ bet and a binary number of $43$ ciphers. In particular, we are searching all of the binary number in this form:

$$\underbrace{1...1}_{14 \text{ times}}\underbrace{0...0}_{29 \text{ times}}$$

All of the possible permutations of this binary number are:


The probability of each permutation is:


This must be multiplied for the number of permutation. So the searched probability $p(E)$ is:

$$p(E)=p(P)P_{(43,14,29)}=(0,64)^{14}(0,36)^{29}\frac{43!}{14!29!}=0.002 \%$$


  • $\begingroup$ Hi Eureka, Thanks for your answer. I read your comment above that the above answer switched the probabilities. The funny thing is...If I switch the above answers probabilities. {43 \choose 29} .36^{29} (1-.36)^{43-29} = 0.002% Which is the exact same answer as yours! Is this correct then? (please excuse if my math formatting is incorrect, as I am still learning how to use formatting on the site) $\endgroup$ – Nathan Mar 27 at 19:39
  • $\begingroup$ Hi :) , I meant that he switched the exponents because clearly $\binom{n}{n-k}=\binom{n}{k}$. Indeed our results are different as you see. $\endgroup$ – Eureka Mar 27 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ So are both the answers correct? or just yours above? thanks :-) $\endgroup$ – Nathan Mar 27 at 19:47
  • $\begingroup$ For sure they aren't both correct: math is just one ahaha. I think that he's wrong because he wrote $(0.64)^{29}$ , but you requested 29 losses not 29 winnings. $\endgroup$ – Eureka Mar 27 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ Yes true! haha, I will try to build your answer in Excel over next few days, thanks! $\endgroup$ – Nathan Mar 27 at 20:49

$${43 \choose 29} (1-.64)^{29} .64^{43-29} = 0.0000205822$$

  • $\begingroup$ You switched the two probabilities. $\endgroup$ – Eureka Mar 27 at 19:26
  • $\begingroup$ Hi David, thanks for your answer. I guess it is just binomial coefficient * pk(1-p)(n-k) Which is similiar to what is explained here mathsisfun.com/data/binomial-distribution.html $\endgroup$ – Nathan Mar 27 at 19:28
  • $\begingroup$ I managed to replicate your answer in Excel using the COMBIN for the binomial coefficient calculation, thanks! $\endgroup$ – Nathan Mar 27 at 19:29
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the correction David! thanks for the answer $\endgroup$ – Nathan Mar 27 at 20:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.