1
$\begingroup$

Let $ g $ be an invertible $ n\times n $ complex matrix. Show that $ g $ can be written as $$ g=su=us ,$$ where $ s $ is diagonalizable and all eigenvalues of $ u $ are equal to $ 1 $.

My Attempt:

Since $ g $ is an invertible complex matrix, then we assume that $ g $ is similar to $ \operatorname{diag}\{ J_1(\lambda_1), J_2(\lambda_2),\cdots, J_k(\lambda_k) \}=h^{-1}gh, \ h\in GL(n, \mathbb C) $ where $ J_i(\lambda_i) $ is the $ i $-th Jordan block with eigenvalue $ \lambda_i>0 $. If $ k=n $, i.e., $ g $ is diagonalizable, then take $ s=g, \enspace u=I_n $ the identity matrix and we are done. If not, it suffices to consider a non-diagonal Jordan block, say, $ \left(J_1(\lambda_1)\right)_{m_1\times m_1} $ with $ 2\le m_1\le n $, since diagonalization and eigenvalues are invariant under similar transformations.

Let's first try the easiest case which is $ m_1=2 $. If we want to find a $ s $ which is diagonalizable, then we can find invertible matrix $ Q $, s.t. $ Q^{-1}sQ=\operatorname{diag}\{ \tau_1, \tau_1 \}_{2\times 2},\ 0\ne\tau_1\in\mathbb C $. Then we can write: $$\begin{align} Q^{-1}J_1(\lambda_1)&=Q^{-1}su\\ &=(Q^{-1}sQ)Q^{-1}u\\ &=\tau_1Q^{-1}u .\end{align}$$ Hence we have $$ \begin{pmatrix}\lambda_1/\tau_1 & 1/\tau_1\\ 0&\lambda_1/\tau_1 \end{pmatrix}=u .$$ Since all eigenvalues of $ u $ are $ 1 $, we deduce that $ \lambda_1=\tau_1 $. Thus $$ u=\begin{pmatrix} 1&1/\lambda_1\\ 0&1 \end{pmatrix}. $$ And it should be clear that $$ s=\begin{pmatrix}\lambda_1&0\\0&\lambda_1\end{pmatrix} .$$ In general, we conclude that $$ s=\operatorname{diag}\{ \underbrace{\lambda_1,\cdots, \lambda_1}_{m_1},\underbrace{\lambda_2,\cdots, \lambda_2}_{m_2},\cdots, \underbrace{\lambda_k,\cdots, \lambda_k}_{m_k} \} ,$$ and $$ u=\operatorname{diag}\{ \frac{1}{\lambda_1}J_1(\lambda_1), \frac{1}{\lambda_2}J_2(\lambda_2),\cdots, \frac{1}{\lambda_k}J_k(\lambda_k) \} $$ up to similarity.


Is it right to give a proof like that?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It looks to me like your answer is generally correct, except that you switched between assuming $g$ was in Jordan form and assuming it was similar to a direct sum of Jordan blocks. $\endgroup$ – jgon Mar 26 at 14:39
0
$\begingroup$

Use the Chevalley Jordan decomposition ( cf. wiki).

$A=D+N$ where $DN=ND$, $D$ is diagonalizable over $\mathbb{C}$, $spectrum(D)=spectrum(A)$ and $N$ is nilpotent. Then $D$ is invertible and

$A=D(I_n+D^{-1}N)$. Take $s=D,u=I+D^{-1}N$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi! Can you explain the reason why $ spectrum(D)=spectrum(A) $? $\endgroup$ – user549397 Mar 29 at 1:17
  • $\begingroup$ Since $DN=ND$, $D,N$ are simultaneously triangularizable. $\endgroup$ – loup blanc Mar 29 at 13:11
  • $\begingroup$ Hum...... still can't get it...maybe a link to proof is helpful. $\endgroup$ – user549397 Mar 29 at 15:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.