0
$\begingroup$

Given a manifold and its metric tensor, how can I compute the distance between two points on the manifold?

What are the high level steps?

Edit: In particular, suppose the manifold is an open unit ball in $R^d$ $$B = \{ x \in \mathbb R ^d: |x| < 1 \},$$ and the metric tensor is $$\frac{2}{(1-\|x\|^2)^2} g_E$$ where $x \in B$ and $g_E$ is the Euclidean metric tensor. How should one compute the distance between two points on the the manifold?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The metric $d(p, q)$ is just the infimum of the set of lengths of paths connecting $p, q$---it's an instructive exercise to verify that this really defines a metric. Of course, it's not practical to consider all possible paths, so to compute a distance one needs to use additional observations, but what facts are available depends very much on the setting. For that reason, I suggest including a concrete example. $\endgroup$ – Travis Willse Mar 21 at 21:34
  • $\begingroup$ @Travis Thanks! I edited the question with a concrete example. $\endgroup$ – user25004 Mar 21 at 23:51
  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of Distance in the Poincare Disk model of hyperbolic geometry $\endgroup$ – Arctic Char Mar 22 at 5:21
0
$\begingroup$

If you have a curve on the manifold (say two-dimensional) $u_i=u_i(t)$, between $t=t_1$ and $t=t_2$, and your metric tensor is $g_{ij}$ (covariant components), then the length of the curve is given by $$ \int\limits_{t_1}^{t_2}\sqrt{g_{ij}(u(t))\partial_tu^i\partial_tu^j}\,dt. $$ If you choose your curve to be a geodesic, then you get the distance.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So the geodesics should be derived first? $\endgroup$ – user25004 Mar 22 at 13:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user25004 : as Travis pointed out, a metric can be induced by considering the infimum of the length of the paths connectig A and B, that is, the length of the curve that minimize lenght. This curve is a geodesic. So yes, you have to derive the geodesic first $\endgroup$ – Gabriele Cassese Mar 22 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ Yes you have to solve the second order ODEs for them. Given your metric you find the Christoffel symbols etc. Your concrete metric differs by a factor from the Euclidean one so many computations will be simple. $\endgroup$ – GReyes Mar 22 at 19:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.