The formula for a convolution is given by

$$f*g(t,x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}f(t-u)g(u) \ du. \tag1$$

My question is, is the following equally correct?

$$f*g(t,x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}f(u)g(t-u) du.\tag2$$

I'm asking because in my case I got

$$f(t,x)=\frac{1}{x^2+1} \quad \text{and} \quad g(t,x)=\frac{e^{-x^2/4t}}{\sqrt{4\pi t}}.\tag3$$

So I get two very different integrals.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ try doing a change of variables in the integration, $v=t-u$ $\endgroup$ – yohBS Mar 20 '19 at 17:14
  • $\begingroup$ I suggest using different letters for the variables of integration in the two integrals: $$ \int_{\mathbb R} f( t - u) \; g(u) \; du, $$ $$ \int_{\mathbb R} f( w ) \; g(t - w) \; dw. $$ Do we obtain the second integral from the first by the variable change $u = t - w$ or any other variable change? I doubt it. That would explain the difference between the two integrals you are getting. $\endgroup$ – avs Mar 20 '19 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ @avs - Are you concluding that $g*f \neq f*g ?$ $\endgroup$ – Parseval Mar 20 '19 at 17:23
  • $\begingroup$ No. Convolution is commutative. $\endgroup$ – avs Mar 20 '19 at 17:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DavidC.Ullrich, I was wondering about the role of $x$, and I think it's part of the OP's overall source of confusion: which symbols denote which variables. $\endgroup$ – avs Mar 20 '19 at 18:41

Yes, since we get: $$ (f*g)(t) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \ f(t-u)g(u) \ du = -\int_{\infty}^{-\infty} \ f(v)g(v-t) \ dv = (g*f)(t) $$ So the convolution product is commutative.

  • $\begingroup$ So in my case, if I were to use $(1)$ I get $$\int_{\mathbb{R}}\frac{1}{1+(x-u)^2}\frac{e^{-(u)^2/4t}}{\sqrt{4\pi t}} \ du.$$ But If I choose (2) I get instead $$\int_{\mathbb{R}}\frac{1}{1+u}\frac{e^{-(x-u)/4t}}{\sqrt{4 \pi t}} \ du.$$ Are both correct? $\endgroup$ – Parseval Mar 20 '19 at 17:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, they will both be correct because of the above, and furthermore you can switch between them by using a change of variables, the first integral is the second with $v=x-u$, although in your second integral you missed a square on the $u$ and a square on $(x-u)$ in the exponential. $\endgroup$ – Kyle C Mar 20 '19 at 17:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.