1
$\begingroup$

$(X|Y=y)\sim N(y,y^2)$, $Y\sim U[3,9]$, where $N(y,y^2)$ is a normal distribution with mean $y$ and variance $y^2$, $U[3,9]$ is a uniform distribution on $[3,9].$

On this condition, find $Var(X).$

My attempt:

Use the law of total variance : $Var(X) = E(Var(X|Y))+Var(E(X|Y)).$

Since $(X|Y=y)\sim N(y,y^2)$, $E(X|Y)=Y$ and $Var(X|Y)=Y^2$ (?)

Plug them into the law : $Var(X)=E(Y^2)+Var(Y).$

Since $Y\sim U[3,9]\implies Var(Y)=\frac{(9-3)^2}{12}=3, E(Y)=\frac{9+3}{2}=6\implies E(Y^2)=Var(Y)+E(Y)^2=3+6^2=39.$

$\implies Var(X)=39+3=42.$

The thing is, I'm not sure about the part I marked with (?).

I'm comfortable with saying that $(X|Y=y)\sim N(y,y^2)\implies E(X|Y=y)=y,\ Var(X|Y=y)=y^2$ because it's just what it is.

But I don't quite feel right about saying that $(X|Y=y)\sim N(y,y^2)\implies E(X|Y)=Y,\ Var(X|Y)=Y^2$, because $y$ is just a number and $Y$ is a random variable. (and of course $E(X|Y=y)$ and $E(X|Y)$ are different things, I guess)

Actually my answer is correct, and it makes me feel more uncomfortable since I don't know what exactly I'm doing right now.

More specifically, I know by the definition that $E(X|Y=y)=\int x\frac{f(x,y)}{f_Y(y)}dx$, but not sure what $E(X|Y)$ means. Is $E(X|Y)=\int x\frac{f(x,Y)}{f_Y(Y)}dx$ a valid expression? But does $f(x,Y)$ make sense? And what's the relationship between $(X|Y=y)$ and $X|Y$? The right side of $|$ symbol only affects to the PDF?

I want to know what I'm doing. Any help would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Your calculation and reasoning are correct.

The conditional distribution of $X$ given $Y$ is normal with mean $Y$ and variance $Y^2$; so by construction, what this means is $$\operatorname{Var}[X \mid Y] = Y^2.$$ In fact, the property that $X \mid Y$ is normally distributed is not relevant to the total variance calculation. So long as $X \mid Y$ is a random variable whose mean is $Y$ and variance $Y^2$, you will get the same result for $\operatorname{Var}[X]$.

I am a bit puzzled as to why you accept $\operatorname{E}[X \mid Y = y] = y$, yet not $\operatorname{E}[X \mid Y] = Y$. The latter has simply replaced a deterministic variable with a random one. The result is that the moment is itself a random variable. So when we write something like $\operatorname{Var}[X \mid Y]$, we are talking about a random variable that is a function of the random variable $Y$. For example, $W = Y^2$ is also a function of the random variable $Y$. I could even write something like $$\int_{x=0}^\infty Y x^2 e^{-Y x} \, dx$$ and this is a random variable that is a function of $Y$. In fact, it is $$\operatorname{E}[X^2 \mid Y]$$ when $X \mid Y \sim \operatorname{Exponential}(Y)$ where $Y$ is a rate parameter. So long as $Y \ge 0$ this integral and the resulting conditional expectation, is well-defined.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.