3
$\begingroup$

Is this statement true? If $A$ is an $n\times n$ matrix and $A^m=I_n$ for some $m\in \Bbb{N}$, then $A$ is invertible.

My trial

Let $n\in \Bbb{N}$ be fixed. Then, $$[\det(A)]^m=\det(A^m)=I_n=1.$$ Hence, $$\det(A)=1\neq 0.$$ Thus, $A$ is invertible since $\det(A)\neq 0.$. I'm I right or is there a counter-example?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Looks good. Alternatively, $A(A^{m-1})=I=(A^{m-1})A$ so $A^{-1}=A^{m-1}$. $\endgroup$ Mar 18, 2019 at 11:32

3 Answers 3

6
$\begingroup$

I think it is easier to see it this way: what is $AA^{m-1} = A^{m-1}A$?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

The right conclusion is $\det(A) \ne 0$, hence it is invertible.

Notice that we can't conclude that $\det(A)=1$. After all, it can take value $-1$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I'll edit! $\endgroup$ Mar 18, 2019 at 11:33
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the prompt reply. $\endgroup$ Mar 18, 2019 at 11:34
2
$\begingroup$

It's invertible since it has a inverse, $A^{m-1}$ that is. By the way, $\det(A)$ could also be -1.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .