0
$\begingroup$

I was trying to find solutions for a high school math problem, but there was one thing I didn't quite understand.

There is a logarithmic identity that says that

$ln\:x^2=2\cdot ln \:x$

However, when solving an equation, the two different forms give different solutions When graphing in Geogebra, or trying to solve with wolframalpha, $ 2 \cdot ln\:x=1$ has only a positive answer to the equation ($\sqrt e$)

But when using $ln\:x^2=1$, I also get the solutions for negative x ($\:\sqrt e, -\sqrt e)$.

If these forms are exactly the same, why do they give different solutions?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

The correct identity is

$$\log x^2=2\log |x|.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! It's weird that it's not mentioned anywhere in the book $\endgroup$ – Zack King Mar 17 at 19:45
  • $\begingroup$ @ZackKing: this is because $x^2=|x|^2$, nothing to do with logarithms. $\endgroup$ – Yves Daoust Mar 17 at 19:47
2
$\begingroup$

$\ln(x^2) = 2\ln(x)$ only holds for $x > 0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It does really seem like that, but shouldn't the texbook at least mention that? Thank you for the answer though :)) $\endgroup$ – Zack King Mar 17 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ I agree, but I guess this is implied as $\ln(x)$ was probably only defined for $x > 0$ anyway. $\endgroup$ – Klaus Mar 17 at 19:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.