Analytic subsets of $\mathbb{R}$ are projections of Borel sets in $\mathbb{R}^2$. I'm trying to understand a proof that these sets are always Lebesgue measurable.
One can first prove that analytic sets $(\Sigma_1^1)$ are equal to $\mathcal{A}(\Pi_1^0)$ where $\mathcal{A}$ denotes the Souslin operation, and $\Pi^0_1$ is the pointclass of closed sets. Then, one shows that Lebesgue measurable sets are closed under the Souslin operation. Doesn't it then follow by monotinicity that $\Sigma^1_1 = \mathcal{A}(\Pi_1^0) \subset \mathcal{A}(\{measurable\}) = \{measurable\}$?
Why do some authors mention the additional step that, in light of the idempotence of the Souslin operation, $\mathcal{A}(\Sigma_1^1)=\Sigma_1^1$ ?
See for example, corollary $13.5$ here, or the mention of $4.1.14$ in Theorem $4.3.1$ of Srivastava. "A Course on Borel Sets".