4
$\begingroup$

Ok, the sequence $f_n(x) = \sin(nx)$ - is it enough to say that $\displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x)$ doesn't exist so it can't possibly be uniformly convergent?

I want to try showing it from the definition of uniform convergence on a sequence of functions, but due to $\displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x)$ not existing I don't think it's really possible.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated :)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Would it be best to show this via the Cauchy Criterion. For any $0 < \epsilon < 1$ there doesn't exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $|f_n(x) - f_m(x)| < \epsilon$ for $0 < \epsilon < 1$ and $\forall m,n > N$ $\endgroup$ – Noble. Feb 26 '13 at 10:12
  • $\begingroup$ that's enough! if a sequence of functions converges uniformly to some function $f$, then it converges simply to that same function (that is pointwise). $\endgroup$ – Olivier Bégassat Feb 26 '13 at 10:12
10
$\begingroup$

If a sequence of functions $f_n$ is uniformly convergent then it also converges pointwise, so it suffices to find some $x$ such that $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}f_n(x)$ does not exist, as you suspect. One easy example to prove is $x=\pi/4$, as $\sin(2k\cdot \pi/4)$ is $0$ if $k$ is even and $\pm 1$ if it is odd.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.