Confusion regarding the notation of associated operator of a PDE. I'm given the following PDE: $$u_{tt}-u_{xx}+u^3=0$$ My source says that the associated operator is $$L:=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+u^2$$ which is arrived at simply by factoring the common term $u$ and thinking of the operator as left multiplying the function.$$\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}u-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}u+u^3=\left (\frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2}-\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+u^2 \right )u=Lu=0$$
Is this correct? In general how do I find and write the associated operator of a PDE? Do I simply do as  my source does and just factor out the $u$? For eg. is  the operator in $$Lu=u_x+u_y+1$$ given by $$L=
\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\frac{1}{u}$$ as given here?
 A: As indicated by the OP, I will regroup my comments as an answer.
The source notes you cite make use of rather ambiguous/confusing notation. Indeed, one cannot simply "factor out" the term $\partial_t^2 - \partial_x^2 + u^2$ and call it "the operator", as this object clearly depends on the function $u$. The operator should be an object which is a priori independent of the function: it takes a "function" $u$ as input and yields another "function" $g$ as output. 
In relation to your actual question. I believe it is better to consider the "operator" $Nu = (\partial_t^2 - \partial_x^2)u + f(u)$, where $f(x) = x^3$ for $x \in \mathbb{R}$. It is now clear that the operator $N$ is nonlinear, and the linear and nonlinear parts are moreover explicitly split. 
For futher reference, the linear operator $L = \partial_t^2 - \partial_x^2$ is called the wave operator (also called the d'Alembertian), as it is the governing linear operator in the wave equation
\begin{equation}
\partial_t^2 u - \partial_t^2 u = 0.
\end{equation}
Hence the equation associated to the "operator" you were considering is the nonlinear wave equation
\begin{equation}
\partial_t^2 u - \partial_t^2 u + u^3 = 0.
\end{equation}
