How can one solve the equation $\ln t = t-1$ to get $t=1$?
It is clear the answer is one but how can we solve this to get $t=1$ and remove the $\ln$?
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityHow can one solve the equation $\ln t = t-1$ to get $t=1$?
It is clear the answer is one but how can we solve this to get $t=1$ and remove the $\ln$?
You might "guess" that $1$ is a solution (and then wonder if there are others). If $1$ doesn't stand out as a self evident solution, then using the Lambert W function, we have
$$\begin{align} \ln(t)&=t-1\\ t&=e^{t-1}\\ te^{-t}&=e^{-1}\\ -te^{-t}&=-e^{-1}\\ W\mathopen{}\left(-te^{-t}\right)\mathclose{}&=W\mathopen{}\left(-e^{-1}\right)\mathclose{}\\ -t&=W\mathopen{}\left(-e^{-1}\right)\mathclose{}\\ t&=-W\mathopen{}\left(-e^{-1}\right)\mathclose{}\\ \end{align}$$
Using known special values of this function, we conclude $t=1$.
Understanding this function, we might worry about additional solutions from other branches of the W function. However, now that we know $t=1$ is a solution (which again, maybe you could have seen without Lambert), we can prove it is the only solution.
$\ln(t)$ is concave down, and $t-1$ is linear. So either there are two intersections, or there is one intersection and at that intersection the two curves have the same derivative. In this case, the latter option holds true. We check that $\left.\frac{d}{dt}\ln(t)\right|_{t=1}=\left.\frac{1}{t}\right|_{t=1}=1$, and $\left.\frac{d}{dt}(t-1)\right|_{t=1}=\left.1\right|_{t=1}=1$, so they are equal. The solution at $t=1$ is a solution with tangency, and therefore the only solution.
Several answers have been given, but I don't think any have addressed the question as you present it. It seems you want a series of algebraic steps by which to manipulate the statement $\ln(t)=t-1$ into the statement $t=1$, and the correct answer to this request is that no such sequence exists, at least in terms of elementary operations (as seen in alex.jordan's answer, this claim is not true without the caveat).
You can always rewrite an equation of a single real variable into the form $F(t)=c$, where $F: A \to \mathbb{R}$ is some map and $A$ is some subset of $\mathbb{R}$, and these equations can typically be solved "nicely" when the equation can be algebraically cast in such a way that $F$ is "nice", which in this context would mean has an inverse expressible in terms of well-known functions-- the exponential map, logarithm, polynomial functions, trigonometric functions, etc.-- at least in a neighborhood of the solutions. The problem is that the vast majority of equations you can write down are not "nice" in this way, and $F(t)=\ln(t)-t+1=0$ is one such example.
In cases where $F$ is not "nice", it is often all you can do to observe solutions of the equation by direct computation, as multiple answers have done, and if you're lucky you can prove uniqueness. In our example, we are lucky in this way: since $F'(t)=\frac{1}{t}-1$, we see that $F$ achieves a global maximum at $t=1$, so $F$ can never attain $0$ at a point other than $t=1$.