0
$\begingroup$

Given the following problem: $\dot{x}(t) = A(t)x(t)$, say A is two by two. We are given a solution $\xi_1$. How can I use this in order to find a second linearly independent solution? Is there a general method such as the one one would use when we have $y''(t) + p(t)y'(t) + q(t)y(t) = 0$ along with one solution $x_1(t)$, where our second solution comes from solving for $v(t)$ in $x_2(t) = v(t)x_1(t)$

I have an example I have been working on: A = \begin{bmatrix} 2t & 1+2t \\ 1-2t & -2t \end{bmatrix} and $\xi_1 = \begin{bmatrix}e^{-t} \\ -e^{-t}\end{bmatrix}$

I started by taking some function $v(t)$ and try to satisfy $\xi_2(t) = v(t)\xi_1(t)$, but then I find that $v(t)$ is some constant, whereby $\xi_2$ not linearly independent from the original solution. Any insight on how to approach this? Thank you!

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Notice that a second order linear ODE $$ \tag{1} y''(t) + p(t) y'(t) + q(t) y(t) = 0 $$ corresponds to the system $$ \tag{2} x'(t) = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -q(t) & -p(t) \end{bmatrix}, $$ and a solution $x_1(t)$ of $(1)$ corresponds to the solution $$ \begin{bmatrix} x_1(t) \\ x_1'(t) \end{bmatrix} $$ of $(2)$. So, multiplication of $x_1(t)$ by $v(t)$ corresponds to replacing the above vector function by $$ \begin{bmatrix} v(t) x_1(t) \\ v'(t) x_1(t) + v(t) x_1'(t) \end{bmatrix}. $$ Incidentally, your system can be easily solved: observe that the derivative of the sum of both coordinates equals the sum of the coordinates, and, after some (not very pleasant) calculation you obtain that the vector functions $$ \begin{bmatrix} e^{-t} \\ -e^{-t} \end{bmatrix}, \ \begin{bmatrix} t e^{t} \\ (1 - t) e^{t} \end{bmatrix} $$ form a fundamental system of solutions.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I have been trying to set up this problem, I am still confused as to what system is being solved. How do I set up my equation for $v(t)$ in the $\dot{x} = A(t)x$ case. $\endgroup$ – rannoudanames Mar 13 at 16:20
  • $\begingroup$ I did not use that method to solve the system. $\endgroup$ – user539887 Mar 13 at 19:06
  • $\begingroup$ Then do you perhaps mind elaborating your answer? I understand the logic you follow to detail the matrix representation of the ODE of the second degree, I do not see how that translates to the case I am trying to understand. I would be expecting for $\frac{d te^t}{dt} = (1-t)e^t$, where $v(t) = te^{2t}$ which is not the case $\endgroup$ – rannoudanames Mar 13 at 19:15
  • $\begingroup$ How come you have a negative in your exponential? Because the solution you provide above fits. $\endgroup$ – rannoudanames Mar 13 at 19:25
  • $\begingroup$ $$ \begin{bmatrix} te^{-t} \\ (1-t)e^{-t} \end{bmatrix} = \ \begin{bmatrix} t e^{t} \\ (1 - t) e^{t} \end{bmatrix} $$ is that what you are saying? $\endgroup$ – rannoudanames Mar 13 at 19:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.