Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity. Let $\operatorname{Spec}R$ denote the set of prime ideals of $R$. For a non-empty subset $\mathcal A \subseteq \operatorname{Spec}R$, let us say that $P \in \mathcal A$ is a minimal element of $\mathcal A$ if $Q \in \mathcal A$ and $Q \subseteq P \implies Q=P$. Let $\min \mathcal A$ denote the set of all minimal elements in $\mathcal A$. Now consider the following two statements:

(1) $\min \mathcal A \ne \emptyset$

(2) Prime ideals in $\mathcal A$ satisfies d.c.c. (i.e. every descending chain of prime ideals in $\mathcal A$ terminates).

Now I can easily see that (2) $\implies $ (1).

My question is: Is it true that (1) $\implies$ (2) ? If this is not true in general, is it at least true when $\mathcal A=\operatorname{Supp}M=\{P \in \operatorname{Spec}R : M_P\ne 0\}$ ($=V(\operatorname{Ann}_R M)$), where $M$ is a finitely generated, non-zero $R$-module ?


It is not true that $(1)\implies(2)$; consider $\mathcal{A}=\operatorname{Spec}R$ where $R=A[X_1,X_2,\ldots]$ is a polynomial ring in countably infinitely many variables over an integral domain. Here the zero ideal is minimal because $R$ is an integral domain, so $\min\mathcal{A}\neq\varnothing$. But the prime ideals $I_k:=(X_k,X_{k+1},\ldots)$ form an infinite strictly descending chain, so prime ideals in $\mathcal{A}$ do not satisfy d.c.c.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.