5
$\begingroup$

The above question is based on this answer to a similar question. I just want to apply what has been pointed out in that answer to this question.

So we are interested in number of homomorphisms $f:A_5 \to S_5$ (if any). Now following the ideas given in the linked answer, $A_5$ is simple, so it has to normal subgroups, viz $\{e\}$ and $A_5$.

If $f$ is a homomorphism then ker$f$ is a normal subgroup of $A_5$.

  1. If ker$f$=$\{e\}$ , then $A_5/\{e\}\sim f(A_5)$, and so $f(A_5)$ is a subgroup of $S_5$ of order $60$.
  2. If ker$f=A_5$, then $f$ is trivial.

Also we know that "Any homomorphism from a simple group to any group is either trivial or injective."

Now in the view of above argument what can I conclude? It seems to me that only I can conclude that any homomorphism is injective. But how to calculate how many are there? Is it a valid approach or do we need a new approach?

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Also we know that "Any homomorphism from a simple group to any group is either trivial or injective." $-$ You have shown that already in $(1)$ and $(2).$ $\endgroup$ – Dbchatto67 Mar 4 at 7:38
  • $\begingroup$ I think $A_5$ is the only subgroup of $S_5$ of order $60.$ So in order to find the number of injective homomorphisms from $A_5$ to $S_5$ you need only to find the number of elements in $\text {Aut} (A_5) = \left |A_5/Z(A_5) \right| = |A_5| = 60,$ since $Z(A_5) = \{e \},$ where $Z(A_5)$ is the center of $A_5.$ $\endgroup$ – Dbchatto67 Mar 4 at 7:48
  • $\begingroup$ For the proof of the above fact see here math.stackexchange.com/q/822096/543867 $\endgroup$ – Dbchatto67 Mar 4 at 7:59
  • $\begingroup$ "If ker$f$=$\{e\}$ , then $A_5/\{e\}\sim f(A_5)$" What does "$\sim$" mean in this context? $\endgroup$ – BalancedTryteOperators Mar 4 at 8:15
7
$\begingroup$

As you observed, the non-constant homomorphisms are injective. Because $A_5$ is the only subgroup of $S_5$ of order $60$ we are looking for automorphisms from $A_5$ to itself.

To each element $g\in S_5$ we get a conjugation automorphism $\phi_g(x)=gxg^{-1}$ for all $x\in A_5$. Because the centralizer of $A_5$ in $S_5$ is trivial, distinct choices of $g$ yield distinct automorphisms $\phi_g$.

Claim. Any automorphism $\phi$ of $A_5$ is of the form $\phi_g$ for some $g\in S_5$.

Proof. The group $A_5$ has five distinct Sylow $2$-subgroups. Namely $$P_5=\{1,(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)\}$$ and its conjugates, each stabilizing a single element of $J_5:=\{1,2,3,4,5\}$. I will denote by $P_i$ the conjugate stabilizing $i\in J_5$. Because $\phi$ is an automorphism it must permute these 5 groups. So there is a permutation $\sigma\in S_5$ such that $\phi(P_i)=P_{\sigma(i)}$ for all $i\in J_5$.

On the other hand, the conjugation $\phi_\sigma$ also maps $P_i$ to $P_{\sigma(i)}$. Therefore the automorphism $\tau:=\phi\circ\phi_{\sigma^{-1}}$ has the property that $\tau(P_i)=P_i$ for all $i\in J_5$. Consequently also the normalizers are preserved: $\tau(N_{A_5}(P_i)=N_{A_5}(P_i)$ for all $i\in J_5$. But those normalizers are conjugates of $A_4$, each the stabilizer of an element of $J_5$. Consider a 3-cycle, such as $\alpha=(234)$. The only two 3-cycles normalizing both $P_1$ and $P_5$ are $\alpha$ and $\alpha^{-1}=(243)$. Therefore we must have $\tau(\alpha)=\alpha$ or $\tau(\alpha)=\alpha^{-1}$. But, we have $$\tau(\alpha P_2\alpha^{-1})=\tau(P_3)=P_3$$ as well as $$\tau(\alpha P_2\alpha^{-1})=\tau(\alpha)P_2\tau(\alpha)^{-1}=P_{\tau(\alpha)(2)}.$$ So we must have $\tau(\alpha)(2)=3$, leaving $\tau(\alpha)=\alpha$ as the only possibility.

It follows that $\tau(\beta)=\beta$ for all 3-cycles $\beta\in A_5$. But the 3-cycles generate $A_5$, so $\tau$ must be the identity mapping. Therefore $\phi=\phi_{\sigma}$. QED.

It follows that there are 120 injective homomorphisms from $A_5$ to $S_5$ and the trivial constant homomorphism.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What was going wrong in my argument in the comments above @Jyrki Lahtonen? $\endgroup$ – Dbchatto67 Mar 4 at 8:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The same argument goes thru for $A_n$, $n\ge7$. The case $n=6$ is a famous exception for $S_6$ when the inner automorphisms form an index two subgroup of the automorphism group. See here for $n\ge7$. $\endgroup$ – Jyrki Lahtonen Mar 4 at 8:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh! Sorry. I have calculated order of $\text {Inn} (G).$ Right? $\endgroup$ – Dbchatto67 Mar 4 at 8:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Dbchatto67 I am not aware of one. I suspect it is difficult in general. Let's wait for an expert. $\endgroup$ – Jyrki Lahtonen Mar 4 at 8:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Possibly @KushalBhuyan. If you can prove some other way that the obvious conjugates of $A_4$ are the only subgroups isomorphic to $A_4$, and hence $\phi$ must permute them. The reason why I used Sylow 2-subgroups is that, as a set, they are characteristic to the group $A_5$, and hence any automorphism must permute them. $\endgroup$ – Jyrki Lahtonen Mar 4 at 11:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.