0
$\begingroup$

$I_n$ is the indicator rv where $I_n=1$ if $A_n$ occurs and 0 otherwise.

Then define $\eta_n = \sum_{k=1}^n I_k$

I'm given this statement:

enter image description here

But in another post about the same proof, I have this:

enter image description here

$X_n$ is the same r.v. as $\eta_n$

But in the first case, $\sigma^2(\eta_n)$ is the standard deviation but in the second case, $V(X_n)$ is variance.

Are variance and standard deviations supposed to be equal?

This is the link to the first case page 8

This is the link to the second case enter link description here

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Usually, the standard deviation is denoted with $\sigma$ and it is the square root of the variance. It seems to me that there is a mistake in the upper statement: the standard deviation should be $\sigma$ (without the square); so they should either have written "we denote the standard deviation by $\sigma(X)$" or "we denote the variance by $\sigma^2(X)$". That is the only way the equation is correct anyway.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for the clarification! $\endgroup$ – user8290579 Mar 3 at 23:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.