Does there exist a continuous, open, and surjective map from $f\colon\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^m$ for $m>n$? My question is that from above. Here are my approaches so far:
I know that there is no homeomorphism between an open set of $\mathbb R^n$ and an open set of $\mathbb R^m$. So if there is an open set where $ f $ is injective we get a contradiction.
Furthermore, since $ f $ is surjective there are right-inverses of $ f $. If there was a continuous right-inverse, we would also get a contradiction since this right-inverse would be a continuous injection from $ \mathbb R^m $ to $ \mathbb R^n $ which cannot exist by Borsuk-Ulam.
Unfortunately, I was not able to use one of these two approaches to give an answer to my question.
If the answer is yes, I would also be interested in stronger assumptions on $ f $ to make the answer no. I wonder if uniform continuity does the job, since for Hoelder continuity and large enough $ m $ the answer is no even if we drop the openness of $ f $ (This one can prove using Hausdorff-Dimension and how Hoelder continuous maps preserve them.)
Thanks for your help!
 A: Theorem 1. For every $n> m\ge 3$ there exists a continuous open mapping $f: R^m\to R^n$. 
Proof. I will give a proof which is a variation on my answer to this question. 
The key result is a rather nontrivial theorem due to John Walsh (he proved something stronger, I am stating a special case):
Theorem 2. Fix $n, m\ge 3$. Then for any pair of compact connected triangulated manifolds (possibly with boundary) $M, N$ of dimensions $m, n$ respectively, every continuous map $g: M\to N$ inducing  surjective map of fundamental groups $\pi_1(M)\to \pi_1(N)$ is homotopic to a surjective open continuous map $h: M\to N$.  
See corollary 3.7.2 of 
J. Walsh, Monotone and open mappings on manifolds. I. 
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 209 (1975), 419-432. 
This deep theorem is a generalization of earlier results on existence of open continuous dimension-raising maps from $m$-cubes to compact triangulated manifolds due to Keldysh and Wilson.  
The next part of the proof uses some basic algebraic topology covered, say, in Hatcher's "Algebraic Topology". 
Take $N=T^n$, the $n$-dimensional torus ($n$-fold product of circles). Its fundamental group is ${\mathbb Z}^n$. 
Let $S$ be a compact connected oriented surface of genus $n$. Its fundamental group admits a surjective map to ${\mathbb Z}^{2n}$ (given by the abelianization) and, hence, to ${\mathbb Z}^{n}$. Consider the manifold
$M$ which is the product $S\times T^{m-2}$. Its fundamental group admits an epimorphism to ${\mathbb Z}^{n}$. The universal covering spaces  of the manifolds $M$ and $N$ are homeomorphic to ${\mathbb R}^m$ and ${\mathbb R}^n$ respectively.
Since the manifold $N$ is $K( {\mathbb Z}^n, 1)$, Whitehead's theorem implies that the epimorphism
$$
\pi_1(M)\to \pi_1(N)
$$
is induced by a continuous map $g: M\to N$. Applying Walsh's theorem, we obtain that $g$ is homotopic to an open map $h: M\to N$. 
Lifting $h$ to the universal covering spaces we obtain a continuous open map $\tilde{h}: {\mathbb R}^m\to {\mathbb R}^n$. 
I claim that $\tilde{h}$ is a surjective map. Indeed, the map $h$ is surjective (since otherwise the image $h(M)$ is a proper closed and open subset of $N$ contradicting connectivity of $N$). Since the map $\tilde{h}$ is equivariant with respect to the actions of the fundamental groups of $M, N$ on the respective universal covering spaces, the image $\tilde{h}({\mathbb R}^m)$ is invariant 
under the covering group $\Gamma$ of the universal covering ${\mathbb R}^n\to T^n$. Therefore, surjectivity of $h$ implies surjectivity of $\tilde{h}$. 
Theorem 1 follows. qed 
