I am told that the Riemann Hypothesis is equivalent to the condition: $\psi(x) = x + O(x^{1+o(1)})$, and asked to prove this in the forward direction. (Here $\psi(x)$ is the Chebyshev Function).

Given the context of my notes, I am aware that I am expected to do this using a contour integral.

I believe from a converse of Perron's Formula, we get that $\psi(x) = \int_{\sigma - i\infty}^{\sigma + i\infty}\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}\cdot \frac{x^s}{s}ds$, provided $\sigma > 1$ where we write $s = \sigma + it$ for a general complex number.

Given this, and the knowledge that the Riemann Hypothesis tells us where the roots of $\zeta(s)$ and thus the poles of $\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}$ are, I expect that we are supposed to take a contour integral extending to the right of the vertical line $\left[\sigma_0 - in, \sigma_0 + in \right]$, that stops before the line $\sigma = \frac{1}{2}$. Thus, by the Residue Theorem, we conclude that the contour integral evaluates to $0$ for all $n \in \mathbb N$, and this allows us to find the desired form of $\psi(x)$.

However, where I am stuck now is evaluating the integral over the other parts of the contour.

For example suppose we have the contour $C_n = [\frac{3}{2} - in, \frac{3}{2} + in] \cup [\frac{3}{2} + in, \frac{3}{4} + in] \cup [\frac{3}{4} + in, \frac{3}{4} - in] \cup [\frac{3}{4} - in, \frac{3}{2} - in]$, and label each straight line $C_n^1, C_n^2, C_n^3, C_n^4$ in order, then how can I compute the integral over $C_n^2$, say?

Is there a nice form for $\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}$ in this range that may make the integration any nicer?

Perhaps am I supposed to take a rectangular contour that gets thinner as it gets taller? If I were to do that, would I be able to justify bounding the integral by some constant, which may be absorbed by the error term.

I am quite confused by this question and would appreciate any help you may be able to offer, thank you.

  • $\begingroup$ Is my answer clear to you $\endgroup$ – reuns Feb 26 at 14:58

Let $\psi(x) =\sum_{n \le x} \Lambda(n),\psi_1(x) = \int_1^x \psi(y)dy$.

$\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}+\frac{1}{s-1}$ is analytic for $\Re(s) > a$ iff for every $\sigma > a$, $ \psi_1(x) =\frac{x^2}{2}+ O(x^{\sigma+1})$.

One direction is obvious : if $\psi_1(x) - \frac{x^2}{2} = O(x^\sigma)$ then $s(s+1) \int_1^\infty (\psi_1(x)-\frac{x^2}{2})x^{-s-2}dx= -\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}-\frac{s(s+1)/2}{s-1}$ is analytic for $\Re(s) >\sigma$.

The other direction needs a lot of estimates specific to $\zeta(s)$, in particular that the density of zeros implies $\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}+\frac{1}{s-1}=C+\sum_\rho \frac{1}{s-\rho}+\frac{1}{\rho} = O(\Im(s)^\epsilon)$ for $\Re(s) \ge \sigma$ which implies the absolute convergence of

$$\psi_1(x)-\frac{x^2}{2} = \frac{-1}{2i\pi}\int_{\sigma - i\infty}^{\sigma + i\infty}\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}\frac{x^{s+1}}{s(s+1)}ds= O(x^{\sigma+1})$$

To translate to $\psi(x)$ you'll look at $\sum_{n \le x} \Lambda(n) (1-\frac{\log n}{\log x}) = x-\frac{1}{2i\pi}\int_{\sigma - i\infty}^{\sigma + i\infty}\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}\frac{x^{s}}{s^2}ds= x+O(x^{\sigma})$

Applying the residue theorem to obtain the explicit formula for $\psi_1$ as a series over the poles of $\zeta'/\zeta$ needs even more estimates, crossing the critical strip, then using the functional equation to evaluate the $\int_{-\infty+iT}^{-1+iT} \frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)} \frac{x^s}{s(s+1)}ds$ part, for the explicit formula for $\psi$ there is the additional problem of the convergence as $T \to \infty$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.