2
$\begingroup$

Let $N$ be an $n\times n$ complex matrix. Show that if $N$ is normal, then $\left\Vert Nx \right\Vert=\left\Vert N^\ast x\right\Vert$ for all $x\in\mathbb{C}^n$ where $N^\ast$ is the conjugate transpose of $N$.

Does it make sense if the norm isn't specified?

Assuming it is an inner-product space I've done the following but this wasn't specified: $$\begin{align}\left\Vert Nx\right\Vert &=\sqrt{\langle Nx,Nx\rangle}\\ &=\sqrt{\langle x,N^\ast Nx\rangle}\\ &=\sqrt{\langle x,NN^\ast x\rangle}\\ &=\sqrt{\langle N^\ast x,N^\ast x\rangle}\\ &=\left\Vert N^\ast x\right\Vert\end{align}$$

A pointer to the right direction would be greatly appreciated. ✌️

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Not all normed vector spaces are inner product spaces, so you cannot assume an inner product exists. $\endgroup$ – Adam Francey Feb 25 at 0:11
  • $\begingroup$ I don’t see why using the inner product is a problem. The OP was asked to prove the result for $x \in \mathbb{C}^n$ which is an inner product space. $\endgroup$ – Jordan Green Feb 25 at 0:46
  • $\begingroup$ @JordanGreen No, $\mathbb{C}^n$ isn't an inner product space all on its own. It also needs an inner product. The question tells us the norm exists, so we know that the normed vector space ${\displaystyle (\mathbb{C}^n,\|\cdot \|)}$ exists. This does not allow us to assume that an inner product $\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle$ and inner product space $(\mathbb{C}^n \langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle)$ inducing that norm exist. $\endgroup$ – Adam Francey Feb 25 at 0:59
1
$\begingroup$

As the question is stated, I would presume that the norm being used was intended to be the standard norm of $\ \mathbb C^n\ $: $\ \left\Vert x\right\Vert = \sqrt{x^*x}\ $, in which case the OP's answer is perfectly fine. In fact, it's not necessarily true that $\ \left\Vert Nx \right\Vert=\left\Vert N^\ast x\right\Vert$ for all $x\in\mathbb{C}^n\ $ for any other norm of $\ \mathbb C^n\ $, even if the norm comes from an inner product, since the adjoint $\ N^\dagger\ $ of $\ N\ $ with respect to that inner product will not necessarily be its conjugate transpose, and will not necessarily commute with it just because its conjugate transpose does. For concreteness, here's a counterexample.

Let $\ N=\begin{pmatrix}1&1&0\\ 0&1&1\\ 1&0&1\end{pmatrix}\ $ (lifted from Wikipedia), which is easily shown to be normal. Let $\ D= \begin{pmatrix}5&-2&3\\ -2&5&-2\\ 3&-2&5\end{pmatrix}\ $ (constructed to be positive definite), $\ \left\Vert x\right\Vert_D = \sqrt{x^* D x}\ $ for $\ x\in \mathbb C^3\ $, and $\ y=\begin{pmatrix}1\\ 0\\ 2\end{pmatrix}\ $. Then $\ Ny = \begin{pmatrix}1\\ 2\\ 3\end{pmatrix}\ $, $\ \left\Vert Ny\right\Vert_D = \sqrt{56}\ $, $\ N^*y = \begin{pmatrix}3\\ 1\\ 2\end{pmatrix}\ $, and $\ \left\Vert N^*y\right\Vert_D = \sqrt{86}\ne \left\Vert Ny\right\Vert_D\ $.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.