2
$\begingroup$

Definitions: $f$ is separable if every irreducible factor has distinct roots. $E/F$ is a Galois extension if the fixed field of the Galois group Gal$(E/F)$ is $F$

I would like to prove the following statement:

If $f \in F[X]$ is a separable polynomial then the splitting field $E$ is Galois over $F$


I just proved this claim in the case $f$ is irreducible itself. What about if $f$ has more than one irreducible factor?

My attempt: induction on the number of irreducible factors. Let $f=f_1f_2...f_n$ a factorization in irreducible factors $f_i \in F[X]$. Let $E_i$ be the splitting field of $f_i$. The splitting field $E$ of $f$ is the composite $E_1E_2...E_n$. By induction $E_1$ and $E_2...E_n$ are Galois over $F$. Now I have to prove that $E_1E_2...E_n$ is Galois over F. If $E_1 \cap (E_2...E_n)=F$ is done but this is not true in general.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Incidentally, that is not the standard definition of a separable polynomial (the standard definition is just that all the roots of $f$ in a splitting field are distinct). The weaker definition you're using is sufficient for this result, though. $\endgroup$ – Eric Wofsey Feb 24 at 18:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You could cheat, and note that since $E/F$ is finite and separable, then by the primitive element theorem, $E = F(\alpha)$ for some $\alpha \in E$. Then apply your theorem to the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$. $\endgroup$ – Mathmo123 Feb 25 at 15:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Mathmo123 but... In Weintraub’s ‘Galois theory’ primitive element theorem is a conseguence of the statement which I want to prove. $\endgroup$ – Leonardo Vannini Feb 26 at 21:54
  • $\begingroup$ @LeonardoVannini Interesting... one shouldn't need any Galois theory to prove the primitive element theorem (see this proof for example). $\endgroup$ – Mathmo123 Feb 27 at 14:45
1
$\begingroup$

If you want to avoid the primitive element theorem : For each root $\beta$ of $f \in F[x]$ your separable polynomial whose $E$ is the splitting field, if $\beta \not \in F$ then it has a distinct $F$-conjugate $\gamma$, let $\sigma : F(\beta) \to F(\gamma)$ be the natural field homomorphism, it can be extended to an homomorphism $\sigma:E \to \sigma(E) \subset \overline{E}$, since $E/F$ is normal then $\sigma(E) = E$ and hence $\sigma\in Gal(E/F)$ and $\beta \not \in E^{Gal(E/F)}$.

That is to say $E^{Gal(E/F)}=F$ and $E/F$ is Galois.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you assuming $E/F$ separable? Why we can assume that? $\endgroup$ – Leonardo Vannini Feb 26 at 23:39
  • $\begingroup$ @LeonardoVannini In characteristic $0$ that's direct by looking at $\gcd(m,m')$, in characteristic $p$ to show $f$ is separable implies so is the minimal polynomial of $\beta$ is much less obvious, I would need symmetric polynomials plus several lemmas. Now here all you have to do is replacing $\beta$ by the roots of $f$, see my edit $\endgroup$ – reuns Feb 26 at 23:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.