In any triangle is $\sin A+\sin B+\sin C=\frac{3\sqrt3}{2}$ always Well, I came with an interesting proof. But I just want to verify it
$$\begin{array}{l}
{\text { Applied at function } y=\sin x,} \\
 {\text { We have, } \sin \left(\frac{A+B+C}{3}\right) \geq \frac{\sin A+\sin B+\sin C}{3}}
\end{array}$$
From here we will get $$\sin A+\sin B+\sin C\leq \frac{3\sqrt3}{2}.$$
$$\begin{array}{l}
{\text { Also by A.M. } \geq \text { G.M. in an acute angled triangle }} \\ 
{\frac{\sin A+\sin B+\sin C}{3} \geq \sqrt[3]{\sin A \sin B \sin C}} \\ 
{\Rightarrow \sin A+\sin B+\sin C \geq 3(\sqrt[3]{\sin A \sin B \sin C})} \\ 
{\Rightarrow \sin A+\sin B+\sin C \geq 3\left(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right)=\frac{3 \sqrt{3}}{2}>2}
\end{array}$$
and from this I get $$\sin A+\sin B+\sin C\geq \frac{3\sqrt3}{2}.$$
Now the equation to be satisfied,
only equality condition should hold. 
So in an acute angled triangle  $$\sin A+\sin B+\sin C=\frac{3\sqrt3}{2}.$$ 
Is there any fallacy in this convention.
 A: There's an implied claim in the second block, that $\sqrt[3]{\sin A\sin B\sin C}\ge \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$. That claim is false. In fact, $\sqrt[3]{\sin A\sin B\sin C}\le \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$ with equality only when $A=B=C=60^\circ$. In an acute triangle, that quantity can get arbitrarily close to zero - consider a triangle with angles $\epsilon, 90^\circ-\frac{\epsilon}{2}, 90^\circ-\frac{\epsilon}{2}$. The product of sines in that triangle is less than $\sin\epsilon$, which goes to zero as $\epsilon\to 0$.
Naturally, the arguments that follow from that don't work.
I take it (from the last inequality claimed in the second block) you were asked to prove that $\sin A+\sin B+\sin C > 2$ in an acute triangle? That's true, and it's as strong as we can possibly have. Equality there is approached by the triangle I mentioned, in which the sines approach $0,1,1$.
A: In an acute angled triangle, it should be noted that $$\sqrt[3]{ sinA sinB sinC} \geq \ {\sqrt{3}\over2}$$ implies that the angles are $ \geq 60$. In this case, the sum of the angles are going to be $\geq 180$. So, such a triangle will not exist (except for the case of an equilateral triangle, where your proposition seems right).
