0
$\begingroup$

Let $\{A_i\}_{i=0}^{i=n}$ a series of events such that $\forall i$ $P(A_i)=1$. Show that $\bigcap\limits_{0 \leq i \leq n}A_i=1$.

My attempt:

Let $0\leq k\ne j\leq n$, so $P(A_j)=1, P(A_k)=1$.

From exclusion inclusion principle:

$P(A_j \cup A_k)=P(A_j)+P(A_k)-P(A_j\cap A_k)$

$1 = 1 + 1 - P(A_j \cap A_k) \Rightarrow P(A_j\cap A_k)=1$

Could anyone confirm/be ashamed of my "work"?

Thanks in advance!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Please also edit the title to reflect that you want to show $P\left(\bigcap_i A_i\right) = 1$. $\endgroup$ – Viktor Glombik Feb 13 at 8:34
2
$\begingroup$

It ,is not enough to prove that intersection of two of the sets has probability $1$. You are asked to prove that $P(\cap_i A_i)=1$. For this note that $P(A_i^{c})=0$ for all $i$. This implies that $P(\cup_i A_i^{c}) \leq \sum_i P(A_i^{c})=0$. Hence $P(\cup_i A_i^{c})^{c})=1$. But $(\cup_i A_i^{c})^{c}=\cap_iA_i$ and this completes the proof.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, but why isn't that enough? if I take 2 arbitrary events and show that they intersect to 1, I can do that with any 2 events, no? $\endgroup$ – superuser123 Feb 13 at 7:28
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean that I can't assume the same thing for more than 2 events? $\endgroup$ – superuser123 Feb 13 at 7:30
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, infinite intersections are , in general, more complicated than finite intersections and you are asked to prove the result for an infinite intersection. @superuser123 $\endgroup$ – Kabo Murphy Feb 13 at 7:33
  • $\begingroup$ Got it, thanks! $\endgroup$ – superuser123 Feb 13 at 7:33
  • $\begingroup$ @KaviRamaMurthy Isn't $\bigcap_{0\le i\le n}$ a finite intersection? $\endgroup$ – Viktor Glombik Feb 13 at 8:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.