3
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space over $\mathbb{R}$ with inner product $\langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle$ and let $(X_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ and $(Y_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ be i.i.d sequences of random variables with values in $\mathcal{H}$. Assume that $E\langle X_n, Y_n \rangle = 0$, $0 < E( \lVert X_n \rVert^2 \lVert Y_n \rVert^2)< \infty$ and that the sequence of inner products is independent. Does

$$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \sum_{i=1}^n \langle X_i, Y_i \rangle \overset{\mathcal{D}}{\to} N(0, E((\langle X_1, Y_1 \rangle)^2)) $$

then follow from the classical CLT?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Let $Z_n = \langle X_n, Y_n\rangle$. We know that the sequence $(Z_n)$ is independent, and that $E Z_n = 0$ and $\text{Var}(Z_n) \le E(|X_n|^2 |Y_n|^2) < \infty$. If the $Z_n$ also are identically distributed (which you seem to assume), then your result is simply an application of the classical CLT on the sequence $(Z_n)$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't see where OP states that $Z_n$'s are identically distributed. Classical CLT does not apply. $\endgroup$ – Kavi Rama Murthy Feb 11 at 23:19
  • $\begingroup$ I added the iid assumption. I see how this holds but I'm just uncomfortable with the simplicity of it. I can hardly believe that it is this simple. I presume I could use LLN for the inner products aswell? $\endgroup$ – Lundborg Feb 12 at 8:14

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.