0
$\begingroup$

Let $$f(X) = 78X^3 + 174X^2 − 116 ∈ Z[X]$$

My question is to decide if $f(X)$ is irreducible in $Z[X], Q[X] and R[X]$

I have tried finding a prime number 29, and to fulfil the Eisenstein's Irreducibility Criterion

1) $29$ is a common factor of $-116$ and $174$ in $Z$;

2) $29^2 = 841$ is not a factor of $-116$ in $Z$

3) $29$ is not a factor of $78$.

So that its enough to show $f(X)$ is irreducible in $Q[X]$.

And for $R[X]$ there should be no root as a integers so its should be irreducible but are there any way i can prove there really not integers root? And i also getting stuck in how to check with $Z[X]$, are there anything needed from the above calculation or is it something new?

Thanks a lot!

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Please add further tags, e.g. abstract-algebra $\endgroup$ Feb 11 '19 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ For $f(X)$ to be irreducible in $Bbb Q[X]$, it must have a linear factor of the form $ax+b$, where $a \vert 39$ and $b \vert 58$. $\endgroup$ Feb 11 '19 at 19:56
  • $\begingroup$ @Robert Not true, e.g. $\ (78x-1)(x-116).\,$ But OP already used Eisenstein to show irreducibility over $\,\Bbb Q.\ \ $ $\endgroup$ Feb 11 '19 at 20:11
  • $\begingroup$ Your question is confusing. You've shown there are no integers as roots because you've shown its irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$ Are you asking how to show that it's irreducible over $\mathbb{R}$ $\endgroup$ Feb 11 '19 at 20:14
  • $\begingroup$ @Dione Hint: in $\,\Bbb Z[x]\,$ these are both reducible $\,2^2,\ 2x,\,$ being products of nonzero nonunits. See also here. $\endgroup$ Feb 11 '19 at 20:24
1
$\begingroup$

Every cubic polynomial with real coefficients has at least one real root and therefore it is reducible in $\mathbb{R}[x]$.

It is also reducible in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$, since it is equal to $2\times(39x^3+87x^2-58)$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ How are you concluding that it's reducible in $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ from that factorization? This cannot be correct because it's irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$ $\endgroup$ Feb 11 '19 at 20:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $2$ is a unit (i.e., a divisor of $1$) in $\Bbb Q$ but not in $\Bbb Z$. $\endgroup$ Feb 11 '19 at 22:00
0
$\begingroup$

One (other) way to show that it's irreducible over $\mathbb{R}$ is to notice that $f(0) < 0$ and $f(1) >0$. Hence, there must be a root between in $(0,1)$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.