3
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a finite group having exactly $n$ Sylow $p$-subgroups for some prime $p$. Show that there exists a subgroup $H$ of the symmetric group $S_n$ such that $H$ also has exactly $n$ Sylow $p$-subgroups.

My attempt: Say $G$ has only $1$ Sylow $p$-subgroups for some $p$ ($n=1$). Then, $S_n=S_1=\{e\}$ so it has no subgroup. Couldn't it be a counterexample? Otherwise, I should look into the case $n>p$, because $n\equiv 1\ (mod\ p)\implies n=1\ or\ n>p$ by the 2nd Sylow theorem.

In that case ($n>p$), $p$ devides $|S_n|=n!$, so $S_n$ has Sylow $p$-subgroups by the 1st Sylow theorem. Say $P_1,P_2,...,P_k$ are them. Now by the 3rd Sylow theorem, $k=(S_n:N_{S_n}(P_i))$ for $i=1,2,...,k.$ And from here, I want to show that $k=n$ and $N_{S_n}(P_i) = N_{S_n}(P_j)$ for $i,j=1,2,...,k$ and conclude $\exists H=N_{S_n}(P_1)$, it seems gone wrong.

So I have two main troubles here: Can't discard the case $n=1$, and can't go further beyond $p|n!$ in the $n>p$ case (I guess my direction - trying to show $H=N_{S_n}(P_1)$ is just wrong?).

Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The case $n=1$ is not a counterexample, because the trivial subgroup is a Sylow $p$-subgroup of $S_1$ for all primes $p$. For the general case, let $S$ be the set of $n$ Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$. Then $G$ acts on $S$ by conjugation, and the image of $G$ in ${\rm Sym}(S) \cong S_n$ defined by this action has exactly $n$ Sylow $p$-subgroups. $\endgroup$ – Derek Holt Feb 11 at 9:09
1
$\begingroup$

An equivalent action to the action given by @Nicky is the action of $G$ on the conjugates of $P$ for some Sylow $p$-subgroup of $G$ defined by conjugation in $G$ (so for $x,y\in G$ $g\cdot xPx^{-1}=gxPx^{-1}g^{-1}$). I'll skip the details as @Nicky's answers seems complete.

As there are $n$ Sylow subgroups of $G$ (precisely the conjugates of $P$), this defines a homomorphism $f:G\to S_n$.

Note that $f(G)\cong G/K$ where $K=\ker(f)$ and $f(G)\le S_n$. So $f(H)$ is a Sylow $p$-subgroup of $f(G)$. The action of $f(G)$ on the conjugates of $f(H)$ is equivalent to the action of $G$ on the conjugates of $H$ so $f(G)$, so $f(H)$ must have $n$ conjugates. That is $f(G)$ has $n$ Sylow $p$-subgroups.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Let $P \in Syl_p(G)$ and hence $|G:N_G(P)|=n$. The $n!$-Theorem ($G$ acting on the right cosets of in this case $N_G(P)$ by right multiplication, see M. Isaacs, Finite Group Theory Theorem (1.1) for example) implies that there is a homomorphism $\bar{} : G \rightarrow S_n$, with kernel $K=core_G(N_G(P))$. We know that $\overline{PK}=PK/K$ is a Sylow $p$-subgroup of $\bar{G}$ a subgroup of $S_n$.

Observe that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the subgroups of $\overline{G}$ and the the subgroups of $G$ containing $K$. This implies that $\overline{N_G(PK)}=N_{\overline{G}}(\overline{PK})$ and in particular $|\overline{G}:N_{\overline{G}}(\overline{PK})|=|G:N_G(PK)|$.

Finally we will show that in fact $N_G(PK)=N_G(P)$ and then we are done. Since $K \lhd G$ it is easy to see that $N_G(P) \subseteq N_G(PK)$. But then, since $PK \lhd N_G(PK)$ and $P \in Syl_p(PK)$, the Frattini argument gives $N_G(PK)=N_{N_G(PK)}(P)PK=(N_G(P) \cap N_G(PK))PK=N_G(P)PK=N_G(P)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.