1
$\begingroup$

I have a closed connected manifold $X$, consider the universal cover $p: \tilde X \rightarrow X$. If I recall correctly, any homotopy $F: X \times I \rightarrow X$ with $F(\cdot, 0) = id_X$ lifts to a homotopy $\tilde F : \tilde X \times I \rightarrow \tilde X$ (again with $\tilde F(\cdot,0) = id_{\tilde X}$).

Given any deck transformation $\psi: \tilde X \rightarrow \tilde X$ (i.e. $p \circ \psi = p$), is there a homotopy $F: X \times I \rightarrow X$ with $F(\cdot,0) = id_X$ that lifts to $\tilde F$ with $\tilde F(\cdot, 1) = \psi$?

My motivating example is $X = \mathbb T^2 = \mathbb R^2 / \mathbb Z^2$, where this is true: $\tilde X = \mathbb R^2$, and the group of deck transformations is $\mathbb Z^2 \simeq \pi_1 (X)$. Any deck transformation $\tilde X \rightarrow \tilde X : x \mapsto x + a$ (for $a \in \mathbb Z^2$) can be obtained by the homotopy $F_a: X \times I \rightarrow X : (x,t) \mapsto x + ta$ which lifts to $\tilde F_a : \tilde X \times I \rightarrow \tilde X : x \mapsto x + ta$. Can this be done for any deck transformation of higher-genus surfaces? Orientable manifolds? Arbitrary manifolds? Is there a "nice" sufficient condition for a manifold that makes it have this property?

Edit:

Recall that deck transformations of $p: \tilde X \rightarrow X$ can be identified with $\pi_1(X)$; denote the isomorphism by $\alpha: Deck(p) \stackrel \sim \rightarrow \pi_1(X)$. I show the following claim:

If $\psi \in Deck(p)$ such that there is a homotopy $F: X \times I \rightarrow X$ with $F(\cdot,0) = id_X$ that lifts to $\tilde F$ with $\tilde F(\cdot,1) = \psi$, then $\alpha (\psi)$ is in the center of $\pi_1(X)$. Specifically, if we want this property to hold for all deck transformations, $\pi_1(X)$ is abelian.

Proof: denote the basepoint of $X$ by $x_0$. Let $g: I \rightarrow X$ be $g(t) = F(x_0,t)$, a representative of the class $\alpha(\psi) \in \pi_1(X,x_0)$, with $g(0)=g(1)=x_0$, and let $f: I \rightarrow X$ be a representative of any class $a \in \pi_1(X,x_0)$. Consider the following:

\begin{equation} G: I^2 \rightarrow X \\ G(s,t) = F(f(s),t) \end{equation}

$F$ lifts to $\tilde F$ which has $\tilde F(\cdot,1) = \psi \in Deck(p)$, so $F(\cdot, 1) = id_X$, and $F(\cdot, 0) = id_X$. Thus, $G(\cdot, 0) = G(\cdot, 1) = f$. $G(0, \cdot) = G(1, \cdot) = g$, since $f(0)=f(1)=x_0$, and $F(x_0, \cdot) = g$.

Going around the square Im(G), we see that $a \alpha(\psi) a^{-1} \alpha(\psi)^{-1} = 1$ in $\pi_1(X)$. This was for arbitrary $a \in \pi_1(X)$, therefore $\alpha(\psi)$ is in the center of $\pi_1(X)$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The thing that makes it work for $\mathbb{T}^2$ is that it's a $K(G,1)$, i.e. that its universal cover is contractible; not that it's orientable I think. The problem is that I don't know many noncontractible simply connected manifolds that aren't spheres (spheres of even dimension will yield nonorientable quotients, and sphere of odd dimension have only finite subgroups of $SO(n+1)$ that act on them, and that's path connected anyway). I would say that if you find an example of such an orientable manifold, some counterexamples should come too $\endgroup$ – Max Feb 12 at 10:23
  • $\begingroup$ I've been thinking about this and while I haven't reached a conclusion, my intuition currently tells me that "most" manifolds shouldn't have this property. I think that manifolds have this property ("for every deck transformation...") iff they're orientable and their fundamental group is abelian. If that's correct, then any surface of genus >1 doesn't have this property, but has a contractible universal cover. $\endgroup$ – WallE Feb 12 at 11:06
  • $\begingroup$ If the universal cover is contractible, then any two maps $\tilde{X}\to \tilde{X}$ are homotopic, so any deck transformation is homotopic to the identity; there can't be counterexamples with contractible universal cover. Moreover, if $G$ is a nonabelian subgroup of $SO(n+1)$ that acts freely on $S^n$, $n\geq 3$ odd, then $\pi_1(S^n/G) = G$ is nonabelian, but any deck transformation is in $SO(n+1)$ so homotopic to the identity. So the abelianness of the fundamental group doesn't come into play. As I said, I don't know yet whether orientability plays a role $\endgroup$ – Max Feb 12 at 11:24
  • $\begingroup$ But a homotopy between two maps $\tilde X \rightarrow \tilde X$ doesn't necessarily project to a homotopy of the maps on $X$. I'll edit the question to include what I (now) know about conditions of the manifold for this property. $\endgroup$ – WallE Feb 12 at 15:29
  • $\begingroup$ Oh right, it's not $\tilde{X}\times I \to X$, my bad ! Then it should be easier, I'll think about it when I have the time $\endgroup$ – Max Feb 12 at 15:58
2
$\begingroup$

The answer is no, with counterexamples being given by the projective planes : $S^n\to \mathbb{R}P^n$ is the universal cover of $\mathbb{R}P^n$ for $n\geq 2$, and $-id : S^n\to S^n$ is the only nontrivial deck transformation of this cover.

However, when $n$ is even (e.g. $n=2$), this has degree $-1$ and is thus not homotopic to $id$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Good point, do you have a counterexample for an orientable manifold? (Edited question to include this) $\endgroup$ – WallE Feb 10 at 20:51
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure yet, but I think for orientable ones your property will work. What makes me think that is that if $\omega$ is a volume form below, then $p^*\omega$ will be a volume form above, that is invariant under deck transformation; in particular if $\psi$ is a deck transformation, $\mathrm{d}\psi$ will have positive "determinant", so it'll look like the identity. I don't know yet if this can lead to something though (I'm not fluent in differential geometry/topology) $\endgroup$ – Max Feb 10 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ $-id$ is the only non-trivial deck transformation. $\endgroup$ – Paul Frost Feb 10 at 23:53
  • $\begingroup$ @Paulfrost : yes of course, I added that, thanks for pointing it out ! $\endgroup$ – Max Feb 11 at 7:51

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.