0
$\begingroup$

For $a,b,c,d$ positive given that $abcd=1.$ Look at cyclic expression (i.e. rotating values in order that of a-b-c-d-a doesn't affect the result of equation) $E$ s.t. $E=\sum_{abcd}\frac{a}{da+a+1}$ Prove that inequality $1<E<2$ holds.

What's on my hands so far : AM-GM-HM , Schwarz , Rearrangement principle , Normalizing or Substitution , (doesn't seem so but if necessary) Jensen and Hölder

I think multiple of these techniques should be applied together here but it is quite a work for me to figure out right combination and strategy.

I can rewrite the expression in two more distinct ways : $E = \sum_{abcd}\frac{1}{bcd+d+1} = \sum_{abcd}\frac{abc}{abc+bc+1}$

I tried to reduce number of variables but it occurs that symmetry destructs and comes after weird expression that doesn't look any better.

I tried casework, since it is assumable to have $max(a,b,c,d)\geq 1$ or $min(a,b,c,d)\leq 1$ But not much further step was made either.

I had drawn graph of this function $E(a,b,x)$ and intuitively concluded that E is convex , increasing But lacking multivar-calculus knowledges i can't try to find actual minimums and maximums of E in a given range.

What approach should i take?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Let $a=\frac{x}{y},$ $b=\frac{y}{z}$ and $c=\frac{z}{t},$ where $x$, $y$, $z$ and $t$ are positives.

Thus, the condition gives $d=\frac{t}{x}$ and by C-S $$\sum_{cyc}\frac{a}{da+a+1}=\sum_{cyc}\frac{\frac{x}{y}}{\frac{t}{y}+\frac{x}{y}+1}=\sum_{cyc}\frac{x}{x+y+t}=4-\sum_{cyc}\left(\frac{x}{x+y+t}-1\right)=$$ $$=4-(y+t)\left(\frac{1}{x+y+t}+\frac{1}{z+y+t}\right)-(x+z)\left(\frac{1}{y+x+z}+\frac{1}{t+x+z}\right)\leq$$ $$\leq4-\frac{4(y+t)}{x+z+2(y+t)}-\frac{4(x+z)}{y+t+2(x+z)}.$$ Now, let $x+z=k(y+t).$

Id est, it's enough to prove that $$4-\frac{4}{k+2}-\frac{4k}{2k+1}<2$$ or $$\frac{1}{k+2}+\frac{k}{2k+1}>\frac{1}{2}$$ or $$3k>0.$$

Also, we have $$\sum_{cyc}\frac{a}{da+a+1}=\sum_{cyc}\frac{x}{x+y+t}>\sum_{cyc}\frac{x}{x+y+z+t}=1.$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Brilliant! Substitution does it. I appreciate you much sir. $\endgroup$ – Solvable Potato Feb 8 '19 at 16:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.