1
$\begingroup$

I am stuck with this seemingly easy problem but I am having trouble showing this:

Let $\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H})$ be a von Neumann algebra realized inside a subalgebra of the bounded operators on a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ and $p\in\mathcal{A}$ an orthogonal projection on a (non-zero) subspace of $\mathcal{H}$. Let furthermore $A\in\mathcal{A}$ be positive and invertible.

Show that $pAp$ is positive & invertible and the inverse is given by $$(pAp)^{-1} = p A^{-1} p.$$

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For $p=0$ we have an obviuously false statement. If things should have a sense, than the text is longer. Maybe $\mathcal A$ is realized inside some $B(H)$, algebra of bounded operators on the Hilbert space $H$, then $p$ is an orthogonal projector on some subspace $H_1=[p]=pH$ of $H$, then we may consider "some restriction" of $A$... $\endgroup$
    – dan_fulea
    Feb 4 '19 at 12:00
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! Yes, indeed! I will adjust the text accordingly $\endgroup$
    – Alvo
    Feb 4 '19 at 12:04
  • $\begingroup$ $pAp$ is positive with respect to what? The cone of $\mathcal{H}$ is not guaranteed to lie in the image of $p$. For example let $\mathcal{H}=\mathbb{R}^{2}$ with positive cone $C=\{(x,y)\in\mathbb{R}^{2}:x,y\geq0\}$, $A=I$ the identity operator and $p$ the projection on span$((1,-1))$. Then $pAp((2,1))=(1,-1)\not\in C$. $\endgroup$ Feb 4 '19 at 12:26
  • $\begingroup$ By "positive & invertible" I mean that the operator is self-adjoint and its spectrum lies in $\mathbb{R}^+.$ $\endgroup$
    – Alvo
    Feb 4 '19 at 12:29
2
$\begingroup$

If $A$ is positive and invertible, let $\lambda=\min\sigma(A)$. Then $A\geq\lambda I$. Thus $$ pAp\geq \lambda p, $$ and so $\sigma(pAp)\subset [\lambda,\infty)$ and $pAp$ is invertible in $pB(H)p$.

But the equality $(pAp)^{-1}=pA^{-1}p$ does not usually hold. For instance take $H=\mathbb C^2$, and $$ A=\begin{bmatrix} 2&1\\1&1\end{bmatrix},\ \ p=\begin{bmatrix} 1&0\\0&0\end{bmatrix}. $$ Then, as $A^{-1}=\begin{bmatrix} 1&-1\\-1&2\end{bmatrix}$, we have $$ pAp=2p\ne p=pA^{-1}p. $$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I see. Thank you very much! I thought I needed this to show that for a finite and faithful trace $\phi$ I have that $\phi(pAppA^{-1}p)=\phi(p).$ So I guess the above idea was too strong... $\endgroup$
    – Alvo
    Feb 4 '19 at 17:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But that's not true. Take my example above and the usual trace: you are trying to show that $\phi(2p)=\phi(p)$. $\endgroup$ Feb 4 '19 at 17:04
  • $\begingroup$ Of course! Now I get it! Thanks so much!! :) $\endgroup$
    – Alvo
    Feb 4 '19 at 17:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.